Return PolishForums LIVE
  PolishForums Archive :
Archives - 2005-2009 / Feedback  % width 15

what happens with moderation?


BelgumBeerBest  
27 Apr 2007 /  #1
I read the forum for a while and like what it gives me but i notice resently that some members have posts taken because not on topic and not useful for Polish forum people

But now I see many posts noy on topic and nothing happens, why there are double standard because this is obvious to everyone that is not fair, we can see what happens

Please explain
Admin 29 | 1,484   Administrator
27 Apr 2007 /  #2
Please register/log in and you'll most likely see all posts (anonymous users do not see all the forums).

Admin
OP BelgumBeerBest  
27 Apr 2007 /  #3
Thank you for reply - I didnt know I dont see everything this is interesting

But it doesn't answer my question why before off topic posts were removed very strict but now many people who dont post on topic are not removed.

Why has this changed in the resent short time maybe one week ago?

Thank you
daffy 23 | 1,500  
27 Apr 2007 /  #4
The part of the forum you see if the main thrust of the Poland & Polish community.

Please register/log in and you'll most likely see all posts that answer your question.
OP BelgumBeerBest  
27 Apr 2007 /  #5
You dont understand or dont want to answer my question
Admin 29 | 1,484   Administrator
27 Apr 2007 /  #6
why before off topic posts were removed very strict

Sigh.. If you read some posts from the FAQ section you will notice many users complained the moderation is too strict. You claim otherwise. We'll then focus on doing our job the best we can (to satisfy most users -- IF possible :).

Admin
daffy 23 | 1,500  
27 Apr 2007 /  #7
why before off topic posts were removed very strict but now many people who dont post on topic are not removed.

I dont see it as such. and you dont see the full picture. please register/ log in, participate in the forum and then see if you feel the same.
OP BelgumBeerBest  
27 Apr 2007 /  #8
Today, 11:57 - Attached on merging:
Thank you for trying to help

"many users complained the moderation is too strict. You claim otherwise"

No, this is not what I claim. What I claim is an appearance of double standard. I made this point very clear in previous posts

The additional point I make very clearly in my earlier posts is that these double standards are very obvious to all who regularl visit, read and contribute to the forum.

Then I asked why these standards have changed in the past week more or less.

You invite me to register. Thank you very kind. You invite me to register again. I say thank you very kind again now please answer question. You invite me to register one more time but still ignore the question.

So now I say thank you, I understand now, you just want more member in forum and ignor difficult question.
daffy 23 | 1,500  
27 Apr 2007 /  #9
yea if we wanted to ignore you, the Admin and I wouldn't have answered you within MINUTES :hihi:
OP BelgumBeerBest  
27 Apr 2007 /  #10
"the Admin and I answered you within MINUTES"

Maybe you reply within MINUTES but you answer nothing hihi to you too

You are one of worst for double standards Daffy and you think people dont notice.

Maybe moderator power goes to your head but everybody see and know
Admin 29 | 1,484   Administrator
27 Apr 2007 /  #11
OK - you are an anonymous user (who cannot even post in the FAQ & Feedback section - and there's a reason for that).

Then you claim something about "changing standards" which we (who spent online 16 hours a day each and read every post) are not aware of. You also refer to "your earlier posts" which could possibly be made by any other anonymous user.

But it's your opinion and we respect that.

Admin
daffy 23 | 1,500  
27 Apr 2007 /  #12
ouble standards Daffy

id like to see what basis you make this claim?
I have no problem accepting factual evidence and ensure that moderation is always fair.
If you can prove I have not - im listening - and willing to correct if any turn up :)
OP BelgumBeerBest  
27 Apr 2007 /  #13
Today, 12:15 - Attached on merging:
very confused but thank you to

OK - you are an anonymous user (who cannot even post in the FAQ & Feedback section - and there's a reason for that).

Yes, so this seems, but as I never see the other part of the forum I obviously cant comment on it. I can only talk about the part I see. So this is the part I talk about

Then you claim something about "changing standards" which we (who spent online 16 hours a day each and read every post) are not aware of.

Yes, now you are start to understand. I talk about obsessive removal of some off topic posts by certain members of the forum. This is OK because the rules say this. I cant complain about obey the rules. Of course.

But what I can complain about, and what everybody see, is that rules are not applied fairly because some members almost never post on topic and almost never have posts removed. I now name Hueg for egsample and also Daffy who say he has posts removed but many off topic posts stay

This is the double standard I talk about.

As you are admin and on here 16 hour a day you say, this double standard, treat different posters in different way, must have been noticed. If it was noticed and nothing was done to stop it then admin must be complicit in this.

This is not right and not fair and to me looks like 1960s communism

You also refer to "your earlier posts" which could possibly be made by any other anonymous user.

I believe I made 2 posts before I made this comment

But it's your opinion and we respect that.

I am greatfully obliged
daffy 23 | 1,500  
27 Apr 2007 /  #14
This is the double standard I talk about.

but do not back up.

I am greatfully obliged

not a problem - we read everything here.
Admin 29 | 1,484   Administrator
27 Apr 2007 /  #15
When moderating, the name of the author does not determine if the post is edited/removed/moved or not.

Admin

Archives - 2005-2009 / Feedback / what happens with moderation?Archived