What do you mean by: "check out the thread," etc.?
Now what do you think I mean?
Do you mean it's ME who have got to look for evidence confirming the validity of your claims?
You're the one who's claiming something pretty extreme.
Wouldn't you think it's your task? Well, it seems you don't provide the evidence in question because it doesn't exist, and therefore I repeat: you're a liar and slanderer. Get lost, idiot
Buzz off, troll.
And Mail Online turn it in to public town square lynching.
Ah, right. A forum. Check out some of the comments on Onet.pl, if you're looking for xenophobia.
The principles of basic human rights were drawn up by human beings as a way of ensuring that the dignity of everyone is properly and equally respected.
Meaningless. How can principles be 'drawn up'. You're mixing your opinions with laws. Show me any document that says English or Scottish law conceals the names of arrested persons from the media.
they haven't been proven guilty so it's wrong to portray them as criminals. As of now they are still insistent. This is the basics.
They aren't portrayed as criminals. In the UK, people are innocent until proven guilty. The press is free to report a court case, including names off all parties except minors and people whose names would identify minors, rape victims and protected witnesses.. Unless you know otherwise.
you can call yourself dalai lama for all i care.
I might well. But you are still wrong.