Cultural marxism, leninism and communism?

Am i the only one here, who can truly respect and appreciate cultural marxism, leninism and communism for what they are? and their benefits to humanity?

That's a made-up term and more a conspiracy theory than anything actually real.

sort of like toxic masculinity?

Probably, though made up by different people.

Which of those people or groups are more insane in your opinion? vs more sane.

There's little difference, however women academics argue well about the concept of toxic masculinity and use the term to empower, whereas 'cultural marxism' is purely made up by people of ill-will who spend too much time online.

empower who or what? it certainly is not empowering masculinity or the idea of being a man or attracted to male things like boys not playing with barbies and becoming ladybois and ****. and what females would be empowered by that crap themselves? putting males and male dominated things down? how is destroying the konan series on amazon prime empowering anyone?

It isn't meant to.


You mean transgender?


＝

so who is it exactly aimed at empowering and why does it have to put down natural things in life like masculinity we all need for humanity to thrive in order for it to? I also disgress thwt it empowere anyone.

Does it?


Do we?

yes, we do. Again, do you really ant boys growing up to be in touch with their feminine side and being forced to play with barbies and drink soy and foregoing their natural instinct of being into masculine things?

Is that a bad thing?


Are they forced ro play with Barbies?

What does soya milk have to do with anything?

so you want future societies to be a bunch of trannies, soy boys and ladybois from Thailand to run around while everything that is good and that is masculine has to be repressed even if it is inside the instinct by natural of half the population? should they be forced to drink soi too?

What is a 'soy boy'? Is it an American term?


Plenty of those (for centuries even) and no harm to society at all.

I mean look what happened to white Americans as a result of such policies in places like California. you got these men who are hiding behind others like their buddies in a group like what happened to me at Brady's in Santa Cruz or the cops and evne lying while they start **** trying to feel tough or belittle someone they outnumber meanwhile being intimidated and knocked out constantly by masculine black men over there or being intimidated by mexican gang members. do you really want your race and society to look this bad and depressing? I mean they literally arent even fighting back due to their soish nature there now but eant to feel tough and intimidate:

youtu.be/m1zLOvnLZig

What happened?

And what is a 'soy boy'?

Too much soy was said to reduce masculinity.

I guess nowadays men are not required to be the warriors protecting the village anymore so there is no more drive to build strong aggressive males and weed to out the weaklings.

It don't matter these days a soy soldier can still operate a remote drone and take out a whole village of women and children in Africa without fear of any consequences, same as a hard case war face heterosexual.

I don't think it does. It's just nasty fake milk and an ingredient in sauce.


They aren't, not in any part of the world you or I would want to live in.


Aren't 'the warriors protecting the village'?

They had no chance against Obamas 500 odd drone strikes 800 dead civilians, so that he could spread his ideology and hunger for control of assets across the world.

thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2017-01-17/obamas-covert-drone-war-in-numbers-ten-times-more-strikes-than-bush

Is it worth all these dead civilians just to promote one ideology above the other, or does anyone else like me think it is all to do with protecting and generating wealth for the aggressor.

Toxic masculinity in action.


has war ever been about anything else?

That along with arrogance aggressiveness, and greed all mainly a male traits, would be interesting if we could see more women in charge.

I agree. Looking at Germany, New Zealand and a few other places.

A true egalitarian would call academics just that and without any gender identifiers.

But yes, women are notorious for starting needless arguments all the time so I see why you qualified the word.


Absolutely. A concept. Nothing based in reality.


Indeed, used to empower women at men's expense. A very toxic thing for women and their simp supporters to do. Nothing more than bullying really.

If their field is Womens' Studies? No.


Poor you, so oppressed...

No.

Again, if you were a true egalitarian you wouldn't be supporting such divisive make-believe mumbo jumbo.

And because nothing good comes from such "studies" (again, not based in reality) it is self-evident that they are nothing more than pretend work created by lesbians so they can have desk jobs which don't amount to being secretaries for male managers.

Whoever said that?


You don't get to decide.


You're decades out of date (or just entirely inexperienced in the world of work) if you think there are many secretaries nowadays (or that management is a male profession).

I don't see how replacing men with women at amazon prime due to supposedly "toxic masculinity" improved their service or content of it anymore and all it did was the opposite for instance cancelling the conan series that was in production which was toxic masculinity in all its finest glory, just like jow i like my media consumption and content.

The feminists who have been vocally demanding equality for decades. You know them, just look at any of their biographies. They are all lesbian daddy's girls or bored closeted lesbian housewives.


If we are all equal then we should all have a say, thank you very much.

But granted, you don't believe your own rhetoric. Internet trolls never do.


Not at all. Women always demand to have jobs that men do but they absolutely don't want the ones which are noisy, dirty, or interfere with their endless need for time off. Desk jobs have always been a safe bet and still are. Now factor in the lesbians who don't want to be in a subordinate, lower paying job to a real man. So they find sanctuary in woke colleges and universities. Indeed, until religion fell out of favor in society the Christian raised ones among them would have hidden away in a nunnery while the Jewish ones would have just made do, living a comfortable but unremarkable life in their exclusionary communities, until they died from boredom.

And that's a bad thing?


You just answered my question.


Really? So women don't do noisy or dirty work? Interesting...

Not when it isn't practiced by those who preach it.


You made a statement which I easily refuted as usual.


No, they don't. Neither in name nor in practice. If they don't avoid such job in the first place then women always maximize their time away from work and only put forth a halfhearted effort when they decide they want to show up knowing that by then the men at work have been tasked to pick up their slack.

Feminists have never marched or complained that women are under-represented in construction, sanitation, or harvesting work.

And they never will.

Feminists only want women to have jobs where they can have their name on a door but never be at their desk.