Because they know they will always be the center of attention and get all the sympathy while the men they decide to turn against are tarred as rapists or homosexuals.
And this pathetic state is the best that modern women have to offer to men who simply want to start a family.
That all gets instilled in them by their mothers by the time they are seven years old. By the time they are 13 they are little sassy snots. By the time they are 16 they know how to work it. By the time they are 21 they are big mouthy b!tches. By the time they are 30 they have total attitude (listen to me growl, listen to me roar, I am woman) By the time they are 40 men just stay away from them to avoid the drama. Its a double-edged sword, can't live with them and you can't shoot them. (Just kidding about the shooting part girls) ๐
He did but his wife found and confiscated one. Now she is looking for 2 more but Novi is clever - instead of under the pillow, he keeps his guns under the sheet!!!
A new law on rape has just been passed in Poland. The old one had been in force since 1932. Almost 100 years. Incredible.
According to the new definition, rape is causing another person to have sexual intercourse by force, unlawful threat, deceit or in any other way despite the lack of consent. The regulation, which changed the definition of rape in the Penal Code, came into force on Thursday.
The key change in the amendment concerns Article 197, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code. The previous provision in the Penal Code read: "whoever, by force, unlawful threat or deceit, induces another person to engage in sexual intercourse, shall be subject to the penalty of imprisonment for a term of between two and 15 years".
The provision was therefore supplemented, among other things, by "lack of consent".
I suppose some woke, progressive crap has been implemented that will make everything worse for everybody but activists will get their paychecks from American taxpayers.
Michaล S., an "exemplary husband and father of two preschool kids" was arrested for raping and murdering a 13-year-old girl 15 years ago. Finding him by Polish "X-Files" team was possible thanks to a new method and improved DNA testing.
The 37-year-old man had no previous problems with the law, graduated from a university and worked in a laboratory. On his social media he was posting photos with his wife, about everyday life and photo reports from the runs he took part in different parts of Poland. Among his posts there was one empathic one about children with disabilities.
He admitted his guilt, but refused to give any further explanations:
Why am I posting about this? I'm posting this for men who tell women to "pick better men." As you can see - it's not always that easy...
He admitted his guilt, but refused to give any further explanations:
One rapist and murdere is one too many, and yes, it keeps on happening. A terrible thing.
improved DNA testing.
Are DNA tests routinely taken by Polish police when people are arrested for, say, vehicle crimes? In countries where that is done, it has solved a lot of crimes, including rape and murder. Sometimes, the sample shows that the arested person is a relative of a person whose DNA was found at a crime scene or taken from a victim's body. This gives the police a lead since they can look at the person's relatives and find them.
I guess three men on this forum disagree with that (judging by the downvotes on my previous post) o_O
Are DNA tests routinely taken by Polish police when people are arrested for, say, vehicle crimes?
No, it happens only when it's necessary for the investigation.
relative of a person whose DNA was found at a crime scene or taken from a victim's body
That's actually exactly what happened here and it was the first case like this in Poland. The relative of the murderer put his/her DNA into a public data base in order to find relatives and that's how the police eventually found him. So it was pure luck/accident.
@Joker, I think both you and me know very well that those were men :)
I dont pay attention to this childish popularity contest.
Is it about popularity though or was there something more disturbing at play? Because who downvotes a post about a rapist and murderer getting caught? ๐ค This doesn't seem normal to me...
Because who downvotes a post about a rapist and murderer getting caught?
A sick individual.
The votes thing is rather pointless.
No, it happens only when it's necessary for the investigation.
It would be good to take them routinely. This has solved a lot of crimes, especially sex crimes and murders.Also burglaries and a few other things. It has also led to people in prison for those things being released when it's shown that someone else did thecrime.
I wouldn't actually be in favour of it if it became law
We do have it back home when people are arrested. If they aren't charged, the sample is destroyed however before that they compare it with the database of samples taken at crime scenes or from victims of sexual crimes.
It has solved a lot of murder and rape cases, plus the 'Wearside Jack case. There is a strong chance that it will conclusively show who killed Lin and Megan Russell since there is a new suspect. This will mean that Michael Stone is freed after 25 years of a sentence for a crime he didn't commit. There was also the case of the guy who'd been in jail for 17 years for rape. s showed that someone else did it. That other person is now in jail, and the in overt man has a chance to rebuild what is left of his life.
I can see the advantages of it but I would be concerned about cross contamination, especially if multiple DNA samples are found at crime scenes. Laboratory mistakes too. Innocent people may well end up being falsely accused of a crime. Data breaches would also concern me because let's face it our data isn't safe as hackers have proved.
also the case of the guy who'd been in jail for 17 years for rape...
Andrew Malkinson. That was a terrible case. The fact is they knew there was someone else's DNA present but the CPS advised against further examination. Basically they left him to rot in jail for years despite knowing someone else's DNA was present at the scene.
This could solve a lot of cases in Poland.
It could, but as with over here, people would be up in arms about this if it became compulsory.
cross contamination, especially if multiple DNA samples are found at crime scenes
True.
They'd probably have to double check and be belt and braces careful about reliability if it's to go to court.
Basically they left him to rot in jail for years despite knowing
There are some cases now that are horrific, ones with people in prison with no real evidence. And others which are the opposite where they know who the perpetrators are is but can't pin it on them.
compulsory
As far as I know, it's compulsory however they destroy the sample if the person isn't charged. I'd not like it, however it does solve murders, rapes and other crimes. There are good arguments for a national DNA base, especially for health research, though there's the worry that American or Chinese companies could get access to it if a future government let them.
A simple solution is to require a judge to serve the same prison sentence they ordered for an innocent person. That way, they will always ensure there is enough proof before sending someone to jail, and they will know that hiding crucial information has real consequences. That should apply to all legal cases.
A simple solution is to require a judge to serve the same prison sentence they..
That sounds like something a dictator would come up with.
Hold judges accountable for misconduct, absolutely.
But making them automatically serve someone else's sentence isn't justice, it's revenge. Like all leftists its nothing but hate if you dont obey their dogma.