France has proof the Syrian government carried out a chemical weapons attack last week.
He did not provide any details on the evidence or how it was acquired.
I read that article this morning. So what kind of evidence is that exactly? If this were a court case in the US and most developed countries, even a civil one, it'd be tossed out immediately...
'Yeah I have evidence, but I can't show it to you, can't tell you about it, can't tell you how I got it, or any other details....' sounds like BS to me... or at least BS till proven otherwise
So now US is all concerned about gas attacks? If he used cluster bombs or depleted uranium would they still be complaining? What about if they allied with the US, as Saddam was in the 80's against Iran when he gassed the Kurds and US did nothing - perhaps if you're a US ally, or at least enemy of an enemy, it's permissible to gas your own population.
Obama could have prevented all this WAAAY early on - but he was too weak, a man with no balls. He cowered at the sight of Putin. He belongs in a position of preaching SJW Marxist tenets to a circle of antifa basement dwellers, feminists, and BLM - not standing up to strongmen. Putin took advantage because the US dropped the ball.