Poland & Nuclear Weapons for Defense - Opinions

No, you mean:

- No American meddling in the Russians' war in Afghanistan and allowing the 'Mujahideen' they armed to fester in Afghanistan

and

- No American alliance with the corrupt and tyrannical Saudis and no American Middle East 'interventions'

- No Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida

- No 9/11

- No Afghanistan and Iraq invasions by Americans

- No destabilisation of entire region

- No ISIS and co

- No refugee crisis

- No slide to the far right in Europe due to hysteria over increase of Middle Eastern migrants

- No increasing danger of rise of fascism in Europe

You need to work on your reading comprehension. I was talking about causality, you are interpreting it as blame.


Austria-Hungary.

The Germans didn't start WW1, but got blamed for it by France and Britain afterwards. Only reason being that these colonial empires wanted to get rid of a competing pre-WW1 world power. Same thing happened in 1939. The Brits and French both declared war on the Germans while coveniently forgetting the second aggressor. So much for caring about Poland and fighting for freedom and democracy. Germany had become too powerful again; that was their only motivation for going against Hitler. Even the British war criminal Churchill admitted after the war that they had "slaughtered the wrong pig". Well, and what did our fine fighters for freedom and democracy do after WW2? They sold Central and East Europe to the Soviets. 45 years of living under a dictatorship followed. Thank you very much.


Britain and France joined in, all right, but not for Poland. Only the Americans and Russians saved your sorry asses, dude.

Poland will never get nukes, but will get the anti-missiles shield sponsored in part by the US.

Sure - after all US protection has worked out well for the Ukraine and it's not like US politics might become unpredictable

Where do we sign up ?

And if it's sponsored "in part" by the US who else is guaranteeing it ?

"Never" is a great word; historians love it - it ages beautifully. xD

Anyways, do you also publish next week's lottery numbers or is your magical ability to predict future limited to nukes only?

I love how it went from being seen as crazy about ten years ago, and secluded to some internet forums, to being openly discussed in Polish mass media.
Hey, I'm not crazy anymore, I think.

Let's not rush to judgement.....

We have always been way ahead of our time, Iron. Typical of great minds.

What will Russia do to stop a possible NATO invasion? It will drop a few nuclear bombs on selected locations in Poland. What will NATO do if Russia occupies Poland? It will drop a few nuclear bombs on Russian troops in Poland. In the final effect, the bombs always explode only in Poland. 🙉

Fate of frontline countries. Same would have happened to Germany if the Cold War had turned hot.

Nuclear interceptors have about a 60% chance of destroying an incoming nuclear missile without causing it to detonate. That alone makes nuclear weapons highly inefficient, costly, and risky to use.

What make you such an expert about Nuclear interceptors? You make a great Armchair General though, keep the laughs coming!

Erm.....


elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2026/03/02/joint-declaration-of-president-macron-and-chancellor-merz


Ummm.....

It looks like Germany goes nuclear?


news.sky.com/story/macron-says-france-must-be-feared-as-he-announces-increase-in-nuclear-arsenal-13514459

....who would have thought that he takes a lesson from Trump.....