European News and Poland Thread - part 4

That's what we have back home now.

Steady change is sustainable change and yes, it's a paradox that the only way to make that is to work through grindingly slow bureaucracy.

I am in favor of making migrant life as painful as legally possible to cause them to GTFO and go back home - even if home is a public latrine...

I couldn't agree more.......we don't need that scum in the west.

What you call progress and what I call progress are two very different things.
You are using a very broad paint brush, Mr. Twister
How about, the majority of people who like Moral advancement and improvements of ethical standards.

I can explain...

One man, one woman for life - medieval and retarded

100 "lovers", STDs, 5 kids, each with a different black sperm donor - progressive and commendable

See how simple things can be...Me a genius again...

@Novi
Makes you wonder what kind of poor parenting happened in his childhood that made him turn out to be such a sick and pathetic human being.

There is no linear progress.
While there may be some improvements over time, progressivism is not solely about that. It involves implementing misguided ideas and imposing them on people.
Anyone with common sense and knowledge would oppose this approach.
--

There is no single solution or recipe that guarantees success. Modernity has brought forth the notion that there is one specific formula, which, if followed exactly, will ensure general well-being and prosperity for mankind. This is the biggest delusion. There is no cure-all for the problems of the world.

The divide between left and right, and between conservatives and liberals, arises from a democratic party system that makes it easier for people to categorize themselves into groups. This categorization is limited in its usefulness. Therefore, I prefer not to use these labels, as they are imprecise and do not accurately represent an individual's thoughts, if they have any at all.
---

What majority? Are you referring to those with strong opinions? They make up about 20% of every society; another 20% consists of the criminal class or those who are struggling both morally and materially. The remaining 60% tend to follow the top 20%. If the top 20% has a consensus, the followers will align with their opinion. So what exactly are you asking me here?

Who decides which ideas are "misguided" and which aren't?


That's the old "no labels, no solutions" argument. Don't you think it's a paradox, I-S, how rejecting progress always gets dressed up as wisdom. Clarity isn't delusional; it's how humanity truly moves forward most sustainably.


So... progress is just a niche hobby, the poor are a moral threat, and the masses are sheep? Sounds less like analysis and more like a convenient excuse to ignore change.

Reducing people to percentages and dismissing their agency isn't insight - it's elitism. Progress isn't driven by a chosen few; it's built when ordinary people demand better and refuse to be written off.

Who decides which ideas are "misguided" and which are not? It's often determined by the consequences of their implementation in real life, both in the short term and long term. Additionally, it involves people like us who are qualified to make those decisions. In forums like this, it's not just you and me; there may be two or three others who are also capable of participating in this discussion. Talking about elitism - talking about reality.
--

As for rejecting progress, I don't oppose change if that's what you're referring to. I reject changes that are artificially imposed, presented as gifts to humanity, when their true motives and outcomes are dark and sinister. Recognizing this is a matter of wisdom and realism for me. While you may define it differently, I stand by my choice to call it wisdom.
--

The real question is: who can see clearly, and whose vision is clouded?
--

As for the notion of progress, considering how the world develops, can you be certain that your version of progress is genuinely moving humanity forward? Or will we ultimately witness something akin to regression?
---

I don't reduce people to percentages or dismiss their agency or expectations. There are many factors at play, and I'm simplifying my argument for clarity. What I mean is that even if the majority of people have an agenda, they won't act coherently or achieve the desired change without guidance from the top 20 percent of leaders.

In Western civilization, we are more attuned to people's needs. In some other countries, people may have needs, but they will struggle to fulfill them because their systems won't allow it. These systems often elevate the top 20 percent into a ruling class, and if they reject the system, the system ultimately rejects them-Russia is a prime example of this dynamic.

Looks like you and I both had the same idea about a post 🤒

Great Britain used to be the leading nation in the world.
Now, especially after Brexit, Great Britain is struggling to find its place in the world.

That's what happens when a country stops protecting its own and sides with the invaders. Then even the invading scum feels contempt for the host.

Those riots in LA are a perfect example of how it works. Thank God we have ICE, the Marines, and Trump.

In Sweden, white Swedes passively stand by as Somalis rape their women. "Disgusting slime" is not good enough for these passive aholes...

Ii don't think they could if they wanted to.
Britain is not prepared for a war.

msn.com/en-us/news/world/britain-s-missile-gap-is-now-undeniable/ar-AA1DVkg3?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=31921415e3e24447ba58a185fab24500&ei=18

Just to be clear...I meant protecting from the invading migrants...

Just to make it clear.....I meant protecting themselves from Russia.

Britain has fallen. Now everyone has to pull their weight so the same degeneracy does not occur in Poland.

Imagine yourself back 30 years ago. If somehow you had been given a glimpse into the country's future, I am pretty confident certain things would have seemed quite incredible.

That we would have ignored the well-known fact of the mass gang rape of young girls across British cities for decades;
That the British state would be unable to build a railway line between London and Birmingham and would spend nearly £100 billion proving it.
That Parliament would allow women to kill their unborn baby at any point without committing any crime.

telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/19/britain-i-love-dying-one-last-chance-to-save-it-yookay-uk/

You do realise that the newspaper in question has a largely over 70 and ultra traditionalist newspapers.

In Poland where the newspapers exist to say how wonderful the new bridges, stadiums and monuments are and how great the leader is and avoid mentioning anything that looks bad in case an outsider bothers to translate and read it. That and endless political trivia and finance data.

Over there however, the newspapers waist to say "why oh why" and to make criticisms in order to to either advance the interests of the political party they support or to generally effect change.

If a Polish-style newspaper went on sale in the U.K. it would go bust immediately. Nobody would read it due to being boring.

Reflect on the damage that 14 years of a rightwing government can do, and rejoice that we've got a decade at least to make the rich bastards in the south pay through the nose (I would personally just have the fund managers, the Tory MPs and Phil and Kirstie sent away for reeducation).

BTW, the railway line hasn't been built because nobody wants it. A Tory idea designed to make millions for their chums that has been defeated by people power,

Why white people are suicidal morons...



...while migrants are brilliant...

some are...that's why they emigrate.

And notice how they worry more about America then they do their own country.
Have you seen the latest mess that has occurred there.
Quoting:
Petrol stations are running out of fuel after the collapse of one of Britain's biggest oil refineries cut off vital supplies.
A financial crisis at the Lindsey Oil Refinery, owned by Prax Group, has unleashed chaos across a string of forecourts near the plant in Lincolnshire, some of which have been unable to secure any supplies for more than a week.
The supply crunch has been triggered by a halt in fuel deliveries from the site, which was taken over by the Official Receiver after Prax collapsed.
This has left many local petrol stations in disarray as they battle to source more expensive alternatives to remain open, leading to unexpected financial losses.

Petro prices in Britain will pop for sure making the Brits dig even deeper into their pockets yet.

Let me know when I should start dancing...

Looks like Jim doesn't realise that this is a handful of small petrol stations in a semi-zrural area that has plenty of other petrol stations belonging to other chains.

There's no petrol shortage at all.


Really?

Look like he missed the bit two lines before:

He probably thinks it's closed down rather than had a week of chaos that's now been sorted.

You and your "probablies". lmao !

Doesn't sound to me like the chaos has been sorted at all.
There has been heavy financial losses which will be passed onto the customers.

My point was that the Brits here are always diminishing America with their nose in out business so why not us play their high school game back for some shts and giggles.
Remember when they thought our immigration was so funny until we started mentioning their unwanted visitors. lol
Haven't heard much about our gate crashers lately from them have you.
They bash America and Trump continuously with their nose in our business.
We seldom worry about Britain's business and their leaders.
Why is that Novi other than they are jealous of our great country.
F, Britain has now fallen behind Poland.
I posted a few years ago this would happen.

What chaos? A handful of small petrol stations in a local area with plenty of others.


Say you know nothing about receivership without saying you know nothing about receivership.

Jim probably thinks there's nowhere else to buy petrol in the area. This is Lincolnshire (the most populated Lindsey part) not Wyoming or North Dakota.

This is just a company operating in part of one county that had problems, supplied a handful of local petrol stations, and has now been taken over by the government

Stick to things you know about like breaking women's noses.

Really? Give us some examples! Yeah, you have to move your fat ar$e and do some work for a change.......

The difference between us and Euros is dramatic...

They want Trump to fail.

We want them to succeed.

Their problem is that they are obedient bootlickers. Bootlickers are afraid of their rulers and changes.

If I were an obedient bootlicker, I would still be in Poland.

I can explain what I mean by "succeed" if they ask me.

Oh jon, quit acting dumb.

And probably here jon goes with his "probably" again. probably. lol

Oh Milo, stfu and mind your Muslim house guest that has been pounding your daughter in your basement to knock her up three times now with no wedding band on her finger you useless father and Troll.

I'm still laughing that he thinks a delivery issue to a handful of small petrol stations in the suburbs of Lincoln will cause petrol prices countrywide to "pop for sure " whatever that means...

Now you report what I think.
No jon, you can only report what you "perhaps"" think because you have no idea what I "probably" think.
Stop making up lies while you troll.
Do ya think. :-/
(You better call Hairy for some back up on this.)