Your interpretation is possible. But Serbian BRLOG is older. Serbian is oldest Slavic ie European language. Its that R. Its only R that is used as vocal in Europe. Very ancient thing. Primordial. All other languges softened it. Non would say SRB. All softened. SARB, SURB, SERB, SYARB, etc. See?
When ancestors of todays Russians moved from Balkan after Ice Age to what is now Poland and then more Eastern they still used to say VEVERICA. Only later it become BELKA or something. But again on ligic of Serbian language because on the north existed only white-Bela, BJELA, BIJELA version of VEVERICA.
No such thing. There were only Sarmatians. Problem is they still are. Its political problem, not scientific.
Take BOOK. Its from BUKVA. Now go ask one English do he know what is BUKVA. How he could know when Romans confused them and separated from their original language, from Serbian. Some local Serbian ie Sarmatian.
See? What Indo-European? Let them explain BUKVA if its Indo-European. No, its Serbian.
There is the reason why Tolkien, Goethe and Grimm brothers studied Serbian. All European children grow up on Serbian feiry tales and mythology.
Hey people, you know nothing.
Exactly. Connection you can explain only with Serbian ie Slavic languages.
This is also interesting. Take VEDA from Sanskrit. Its known fact its closest ro Slavic languagesž
Spot... Russian VEDAT = to know.
But VEDA and VEDAT only gets full explanation in Serbian - PRIPOVEDATI = to talk story. PRIPO-VEDATI. Pripovetka = Story.
And what is VEDA, VEDANTA? Collection of stories.
Yes, Buddha was White and Scythian ie Sarmatian.
And what is only ethnic name mentioned in Rg Veda texts. Only SRBINDA. Only version of Sarmatian name.