Will America send troops to fight a Russian invasion of Baltics and/or Poland?

Spoken like a banker. Tell this crap to that widow and her kids.

Appeal to feelings is something that the left wing does all the time.

Have you ever seen the scene I just described?
BTW, do you know how it feels to see a folded American flag on the lap of a woman? If not, you have no right to speak on the subject. Ask China to defend Poland. They have plenty of people they can afford to lose.

How about that 1 to 10,000 ratio? What do you consider a good number of dead Euros for one dead American?

If you have issues it doesn't mean that a policy would be made in such a way as to take into account your issues.


From my point of view America has plenty of people they can affort to loose.


I don't need China to defend Poland but you can be sure they will make a better ally than some Americans that do not keep their promises, or simply do not keep up.


That is the most silly sentece I have read on this forum to date.

That was the most disgusting sentence so far.

To defend Poland? Zero. You are not worth even one.

How about that ratio? No comment?

@Novichok Poland? not worth even one.
On my trip to Boleslawiec, I had the opporttunity to admire the American soldiers stationed in the area. There were "Pottery Days" and they could come to the city. Dark skin color predominated. Now you know who were sent to Poland.

Poland is worth all the USA with Hawai.


I'am sure people in China feel the same way about your rascist sentence about China.


You are posting emotional nonsense. I'm not sure why you doing it. My first impression of you wasn't bad. Now you post like Paulina. I hope you are not a stupid person like her. It would mean I wasted my time on you.

Focus on the thread, and not other members please

To be honest, what I am really concerned about is not Putin, but about the actions of his successors. Because by now we know what Putin's deal is. He wants to stay in power, and because he is unable to adress Russia's serious domestic problems, he had to build up the West as an enemy. Crimea will now be used as his great success by his propaganda machine, it will always be brought up when Russians grow discontent with falling wages and pensions and rising food prices. Putin is in the end however pragmatic enough to only take calculated risks.

We do not know what type his successor will be. A successor who will not be able to benefit in the same way from previous foreign political "successes" and who will likely be forced to face some serious domestic turbulences when Russia's long-term problems really come to the fore front. Backed into a corner and no "easy" conquest available, who knows what he will do.

Not to mention how successive American governments will be more and more occuppied with containing China, which in return will make Eastern Europe more vulnerable.

Poland can go to hell if it means one American life saved. You are irrelevant and if you disappeared the world would actually be safer.

This discussion revealed again the disgusting nature of Euros and how you treat the US - the only country that keeps your asses safe. We are a bottomless money pit to you and the Americans as throwaway and disposable objects.

I will stop here so I will not get another warning.


Have you ever seen a sobbing widow getting an American flag? When you have a chance, walk up to her and tell her that Poland is worth the whole US plus Hawaii.

For your safety, make sure her brother standing behind her doesn't hear it.

The US did very well out of the first two world wars (the first, economically, the second economically and geopolitically); and they know that they won't do at all well out of the next one.

WE may find that China is the 'peacemaker'.

That means Europe won't being doing real well then either.

Europe certainly didn't from the last two, though Western Europe at least survived. And in the case of the two main countries in Western Europe, rearmed hugely.

So did Russia so it should be a good one especially if NATO were to pull out.

Fine you are a stupid person. Maybe Putin pays you. If that it is you do your job without me.
By the way have you ever hold a hand of a person passing away? If not you can put all your cheap histerical nonsense where it belong.


Don't worry, he is going to be from the same group that rules in Russia now. KGB/

By the way we have here on the news that Merkel and her people are lobbing in the USA for the northstream and Putin.

Good isn't the word anyone would rationally use, however two out of the three NATO nuclear states are in Europe, and the other very close indeed to Russia so 'pulling out' isn't an option. Hence Macron and Merkel's current panic.

No. The US lost nearly half a million men in WW2.
You don't even realize how much restrain it took on my part to stop after the first sentence.


Your posts on this subject are the most disgusting ones I have read. If the rest of Poland feels the same way, I am so glad to be here.

BTW, how many Americans should be ready to die to defend Poland?

And gained a global role which they did not have before.

Remember also, that they had their own issues with Japan; The clue is in the name: World War.

And how did that "global role" benefit the US other than having the satisfaction of defending a bunch of weasely Euro-morons from the Soviets while the Euros, relieved of that duty, put all their money into investments, welfare, and now to host the hordes?

Reconstruction. Long and slow. And paying for the war.

It was used to make my point of how Russia has rearmed mightier than Europe has both conventional and nuclear.
Without NATO Putin would walk through Europe in two or three months and own it.

Fortunately most of NATO is in Europe, including two of the three NATO nuclear powers.

....like Hitler with the Wehrmacht! He could own it...for awhile....but he would never be able to hold it...and in the end he will lose all and everything!

And let's not forget the duties on the US products while enjoying low or none on the Euro crap going to the US, leading to unsustainable trade deficits.

So, how is that "global role" of being your ATM helping the US?

All of them?

Your nukes don't count. Nukes need two more things you don't have: delivery and balls.


I asked you. I already made my position crystal clear so what's up with your idiotic question...

Says someone who just urged appeasement...


The European nukes are all on submarines...

And Russia has them on their subs so what's your point ?

The United States of America IS NATO !


You don't think there are not any nuke's on Polish soil that Putin has targeted in the first volly ?
Did you know that Iran (Russia's allie) will soon have nuclear capability ?
I see that your "Nukes" give you a very false sense of security.
Down deep you know that the U.S.A. is your only real security blanket.

Not since 1990.

Some people actually believe that

Would you support the building of an EU army? It could take alot of stress from you and Rich....