The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Home / News  % width posts: 281

Will America send troops to fight a Russian invasion of Baltics and/or Poland?


Novichok 4 | 7,903
29 Nov 2021 #91
Or to pointlessly comment for the sake of it.

There was a point which was that we don't give a crap about your stupid little problems. Europe has used up all American patience and the desire to die for you. You have enough people, money, and the nukes. Get lost.
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #92
The usual ray of sunshine from a pointlessly posting wiseguy. Meanwhile, US troops are stationed here in Poland. Whether that's for Poland's benefit or as part of a broader issue is obvious. Russia is a danger; give them an inch and they'll take a mile. That mile will be the shortest route straight over the Arctic with SS25s and perhaps even a Tsar Bomba or two...

So as the Pentagon (who've spoken about the issue of Putinist expansionism) very clearly understand and our resident loudmouth wiejski mÄ…drala very clearly doesn't, these problems are neither 'stupid' nor 'little'.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #93
...okay guys....come down all....there won't be any nuclear war in Europe....

Crimea was alot like the Sudetenland....the West hesitated to call Putin out on it because it always has been a disputed territory with most of the people living there not especially unhappy about coming back to Mother Russia.

But that was it! Any other land grabbing will not be disputed at all...

And economical sanctions and political isolation hurt alot more....you have seen it with Lukashenko. The only thing he will get out of it is making the EU rethink real high real stable outer borders!

PS: China wants to get back Taiwan, they will have their hands full with that soon too...
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #94
there won't be any nuclear war in Europe...

Of course not. Not in the sense we all feared back in the 80s. The bombs are smaller and the targets no longer civilian.

the West hesitated to call Putin out on it

And thus he's going several steps further. At least the UK and France are relatively safe,
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #95
And thus he's going several steps further.

I doubt it....he is no Hitler....if something Putin has enough its territory and "Lebensraum".....and besides the Crimea there isn't anything else really disputed, or is there?

At least the UK and France are relatively safe,

I really don't see the future default lines between Russia and the EU or anywhere in Europe for that matter. We had our time and that is history!

The real future wars will between China and allies and the West and allies.....and in that conflict all need to chip in or all will lose....geography won't save anybody then!
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #96
.he is no Hitler.

He's Putin. And he's thinking about his legacy.

that is history

History has an unfortunate habit of repeating itself. We've had 75 years of peace (albeit with a cold war for half of that time). It is dangerously naive to expect that to continue.

China

China won't hurt their own markets and have their own long term plans. Russia's dangerous plans are shorter term and we are seeing troop mobilisations right now.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #97
And he's thinking about his legacy.

Yeah....and getting his country again isolated and treated like a pariah is his goal, you think?

He could and did book Crimea under "successes" because of the Russians there....as with the Sudetenland and Hitler....a felt huge injustice got straighened out.

But Ukraine? The Baltics? What beef have the common Russians there? How should war there help him? Don't forget the powerful russian oligarchy which wants to trade and to travel and enjoy the nice life in the West...

History has an unfortunate habit of repeating itself.

Only if the environment and the variables are the same (or at least still similiar).....but they aren't! The hot spots have moved away....new global player have come up....
Cojestdocholery 2 | 1,191
29 Nov 2021 #98
.if something Putin has enough its territory and "Lebensraum".

Putin knows that Russia without Ukraine won't be a real power. He wants Ukraine and if cannot get it, he want a large part of it territory.

Europe has used up all American patience and the desire to die for you. You have enough people,

America has been doing very well with their imperialism. If you think you can just roll up in Europe and be very well . You don't know what you are talking about.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #99
Putin knows that Russia without Ukraine won't be a real power.

How will it help his power invading and ruling over an hostile country? Longterm that always ever meant loss....an unending strain on the resources and tanking of the international standing....I'm not even mentioning the economical price to pay.....the EU might have no army but an economically totally sanctioned Russia will be a poor Russia very soon. And the moment his disgruntled while suffering followers start to doubt the intelligence of Putin's decisions it's only a matter of time till he's gone....
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #100
.and getting his country again isolated and treated like a pariah is his goal, you think?

It is already to an extent; the sanctions imposed after the novichok poisoning have not deterred him.

if the environment and the variables are the same (or at least still similiar).....but they aren't

They never have been. We now have different yet equally dangerous variables and an unstable environment. And like last time, no shortage of weak potential appeasers. The only real difference is NATO, an alliance not without its vulnerabilities.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #101
the sanctions imposed after the novichok poisoning have not deterred him.

Because Putin has still to many friends and supporters also in Brussels....politicians who still prefer "talks and trade" with Russia (Nordstream 2 anybody?) But that would all end after a real invasion of a peaceful foreign country!

(And this time it would be a real invasion....no framed "liberation" of homies)
Cojestdocholery 2 | 1,191
29 Nov 2021 #102
How will it help his power invading and ruling over an hostile country?

I said if he can't take Ukraine with the consent of the large part of the population of Ukraine. The qestion is can he take the whole country by force. I think not.

He can however take a part of the Ukrainian territory.

the EU might have no army but an economically totally sanctioned Russia will be a poor Russia very soon.

Germany won't be doing sanctions for long, they will make a deal with Russia sooner or later. Aslo Russia can sell gas to China.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #103
Germany won't be doing,

Merkel will be gone soon....the cards will be newly shuffled in Berlin!
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #104
Because Putin has still to many friends and supporters also in Brussels

That's true, however when push comes to shove, Western Europe only has two major military powers, one strongly aligned with the US and not in the EU at all now, the other with an uneasy relationship with NATO and hobbled by vetoes should there be a need for further sanctions.,.

Berlin

A capital that is increasingly less important and with a new minister of defence that is far from resolute.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #105
We don't know yet who will become Minister of defence...only that he/she will most likely placed by the SPD...
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #106
We don't know yet who will become Minister of defence

Indeed. I was thinking of Foreign Minister Baerbock. A new Bismarck she is not.
Cojestdocholery 2 | 1,191
29 Nov 2021 #107
the cards will be newly shuffled in Berlin!

I don't see them stay for long if they will not provide gas for the counrty. Atomic power plants are out, coal is out, green lobby is not that strong to keep going if energy costs will go up and up and up..

A cheap Russian gas is pivotal for that green German plan to work.

A capital that is increasingly less important

What do you mean? Berlin is a capital of the EU.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #108
A new Bismarck she is not.

That is clear.....but everything else is possible....for the good and the bad!

A cheap Russian gas is pivotal for that green German plan to work.

That was clear as day for power-pragmatist Merkel....but that would make our idealists in the new government look real bad....they will likely prefer to end that dependence!
jon357 74 | 22,038
29 Nov 2021 #109
but everything else is possible....for the good and the bad!

Let's hope it's for the good. I am, however, far from optimistic.

An interesting analysis here from yesterday's newspaper:
telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/28/appeasing-putin-wont-work-germany-needs-strong-western-alliances/
Cojestdocholery 2 | 1,191
29 Nov 2021 #110
or power-pragmatist Merkel.

A total dependecy on Russia as a main energy source is not very pragmatic.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #111
An interesting analysis here from yesterday's newspaper:

*nods*

That leads me back to my post from a few days back after the german election....Putin had quite a good and comfy running with 16 years of Merkel....but if Baerbock only keeps half of her political statements concerning Russia and China true we are in for a big change...but that was the opposition speaking, now she is part of the gov....we have to wait and see!

(One must'n also forget that the new Chancellor will be SPD Scholz...not Baerbock)

A total dependecy on Russia as a main energy source is not very pragmatic.

Na ja....from a german viewpoint....the russian gas had been always trustworthy....even during the high times of the Cold War the Russians always delivered! So, in many ways keeping that gas vault open was a sure, safe, pragmatic thing to do!
Novichok 4 | 7,903
29 Nov 2021 #112
You don't know what you are talking about.

I know very well what I am talking about. I am talking about that the US tied in Korea, lost in Vietnam, got nothing in Iraq - twice, lost in Afghanistan, and like hell the Americans will spill blood and money because Putin wants what was his some thirty years ago back. You, Poles, want to fight Russia? Go for it and don't drag us into your Euro-sh*it. Again. And again...

The difference between all of you playing generals and me is that I see only a widow receiving a neatly folded American flag. Next to her are her kids that lost their father. Her veil covers her tears - if she still has any left to shed.

That's the sad half. The angry half has a number of how many Euros are worth one dead American soldier. As of this moment, I am somewhere between 10,000 and 100,000. If you feel I am off, please tell me yours.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #113
The difference between all of you playing generals and me is that I see only the widows receiving neatly folded American flags.

Thing is it's a voluntary army.....nobody was gang pressed into it as it was during Vietnam....alot of them are immigrants, alot of them poor boys grabbing the chance of a regular income, a good education, good medical services and a future generally they would otherwise never have with both hands.

It's a deal....hopefully done with both eyes wide open and a clear mind!
Novichok 4 | 7,903
29 Nov 2021 #114
Thing is it's a voluntary army....

It doesn't mean sh*it to that widow and her kids. And me...
The implied contract was that their lives would be placed at the risk of dying for a good cause.
Defending idiots in Europe - again - is not a good cause.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #115
It doesn't mean sh*it to that widow and her kids

It will....especially if it's poor families....they will still be alot better off than many others who lost the father and the husband and the sole breadwinner!

military.com/benefits/survivor-benefits/surviving-family-benefits.html

And me...

No Euro decides if and when it's time for the soldier to uphold his part of the deal....if that consoles you!

Defending idiots in Europe - again - is not a good cause.

PS: I'm a German, that argument doesn't wash with me....just imagine the US would had Europe left alone already in WWI.....there is an argument to be made that there wouldn't be a Hitler....and no WWII.....but that would be off topic!
Novichok 4 | 7,903
29 Nov 2021 #116
It will....especially if it's poor families....

That is why I hate the voluntary army. If the cause is just, we should draft the sons of the politicians and the rich first. Then you would be amazed how quickly we would hear, well...maybe we should reconsider the idea of defending the a-holes in Europe...What to do you think, guys?
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #117
If the cause is just, we should draft the sons of the politicians and the rich first.

In the end that would mean the US would have no army anymore....I guess in consequence the US would be to busy somehow defending itself, without an army, than thinking about defending peoples from another continent.

Maybe then the Euros would need to come over to help? ;)

But the idea is nice...
Cojestdocholery 2 | 1,191
29 Nov 2021 #118
I know very well what I am talking about.

No you don't. A war is an extention of the diplomacy. Position of the USA, wealth, and the future is on stake. Your view is very narrow minded. You can't eat a cake and have it.

You say something that Putin would like to pay for.
Novichok 4 | 7,903
29 Nov 2021 #119
BTW, I would like to see you walking up to that sobbing widow to tell her about the contract her husband had signed before his fellow soldiers had to collect his body parts.
Bratwurst Boy 12 | 11,815
29 Nov 2021 #120
Yeah....well....maybe not the best time....


Home / News / Will America send troops to fight a Russian invasion of Baltics and/or Poland?
BoldItalic [quote]
 
To post as Guest, enter a temporary username or login and post as a member.