If you care about Poland's good, you should vote PiS as, in spite of their shortcomings (which party doesn't have them?), it's the only serious and realistic alternative to the destructive rule of the PO.
This is your message #197, Puzzie, isn't it? So unless your logic is imported from another planet your statement can be logically analysed here.
So let us introduce first few abbreviated definitions:
B1: Bad Wolves is a union of all staunch PO supporters, all staunch SLD supporters and all staunch Ruch Palikota supporters
B2: Bad Wolf Head is a head of English department who is also a member of Bad Wolves.
B3: Cinderellas is an intersection of all employees in English departments of all Polish universities and schools with a set of all staunch PiS supporters
Now Puzzie, here is your sweeping statement broken in two parts:
P1: Heads of English departments in all Polish universities and schools are likely to be Bad Wolves.
P2: P1 implies that any Cinderella is likely to be persecuted by Bad Wolf Head
Now, Puzzie I have several questions to you:
P1: What is a likelihood of P1, Puzzie? Probability 1.0 - meaning that ALL heads of English departments are the Bad Wolves? Or you just meant only something greater than 0.5? So Puzzie, declare yourself: did you mean 0.75, 0.90 or what? Or you just really meant SOME? Like: some heads of English departments in ALL Polish universities and schools are the Bad Wolves?
Do not tell us that you really meant just one head of the English department in Skarżysko-Kamienna, an affiliation of University of Jan Kochanowski in Kielce? Or something like that?
To summarize: unless you provide some factual data your statement P1 is as much worth as that of a drunk from a local bar. ZERO.
P2: What is a chance that a Cinderella is likely to be persecuted a Bad Wolf Head? 100%, meaning that EVERY Bad Wolf Head is morally corrupted? Or do you graciously admit that some Bad Wolf Heads are men with high morals? So what would be your assessment? 75%, 90%? Well, you already know the game, and you know that you cannot win here, because you have no answer to this question either.
In other words, Puzzie, all the noise you have been making in the last few pages of this topic, all that "prove it" childish games, are just that - just noise. Grow up.
Aside from the lack of logic in your message you really irked me implying that the Bad Wolves are the same as Stalinists by saying "you must do it in secret", "you got to be very careful of your political views". It was in 1950s that people had to be careful about their views, when a joke about Stalin could land you in Siberia, when little kids stood guard outside school houses while their parents discussed dangerous subject of collectivisation with confused peasants inside. Thank God, this times are gone at least since 1960s. And even under communist rule you did not have to be a PZPR party member to head some departments. And certainly not a fecking head of any department, could tell me what to think or what to do. In most cases they did not dare, no they cared.
And now you come with your PROPAGANDA here. Don't you see that you are no different in your blind obedience to xyz ideas, than ZMP or ZMS activists were? "Destructive rule of the PO, neo-communists", my ass.
Yes, this compares well with: "Zaplute karły reakcji". Matches well.