your casual statements about you ducking down to the beach to pose which littered this thread before my appearance,
I can't help it if I'm a sex object (ok, I really can).
I see that quite a few of my more weighty contentions,
You asked proof of cultural and societal bias against men and I provided you with several examples in post #186 and in a couple of previous posts as well. You have not commented on them. That's the crux of the general discussion but you prefer to play with 'words' (typical lawyer) thus obfuscating the premise.
You, on the other hand, have no genuine experience in the matters being discussed.
The amount of false assumptions on your part are too many to count. I almost feel embarrassed for you.
when cornered with one of the many contentions I have made challenging your credibilty you choose to deflect rather than concede.
The deflections are all yours with your 'word' games instead of addressing the issue. You have no idea how distasteful your mediocre attempts at lawyering sound here.
yes, I do enjoy playing with words and definitions.
No argument there; attempting to parcel definitions until they have no meaning only humiliates you. It's such a phony tactic and it doesn't work here.
hey could be considered anecdotal because they cannot be tested.
You seem to either not know the definition of the word or are once again attempting to be relative with it. If you had really studied the hundreds of Fiebert studies you would realize that several thousand accredited individual professionals interviewing hundreds of thousands of individuals using diverse methodology (most did not know each other) is by definition not
'anecdotal'. Here you are hoisting yourself by your own petard.
As to kicking me out of your 'office', can I assume that's toilet cubicle no. 2 at the beach where you do your posing?
As usual you assume incorrectly. The beach, by the way, starts about 50 yards from my condo. My office is in the south Loop and if you're ever in Chicago I'll be happy to escort you to the toilet there. But promise to wash your hands this time.
As to the question of child custody and the law, the fact that women receive custody about 90% of the time speaks for itself.
In any event, I find it difficult to believe child support payments would be made to the tune of $20,000 per month. Is this just another story Zimmy?
It's always a pleasure instructing you. As a lawyer, it surprises me that you don't know certain basic information.
hellobeautiful.com/mommy-beautiful/hello-beautiful-staff/what-are-celebs-paying-for-child-support/
give me a real run for my money
You don't seem to be worth much money since you seem to be a mediocre lawyer who likes to play word games instead of addressing the issue I brought up. Now be
specificand address the pro female benefits that women receive and men don't. If you can do that legitimately then I'll have several more for you to comment on.
the average numbers are not as high as what zimmy said,
Why do you do that? I didn't say the average amount of child support is $20,000 per month. I merely noted that some people (usually celebrities of some sort) can pay that much and my post above has a link showing several who do.
Zimmy has won clearly here because Ozi Dan has used common lawyers' methods like trying to create doubts
Well yea; playing with words the way
Ozi Dan does is so low-brow that I hesitate to even comment on it but evidently I must. Words must mean something and not be so parceled
as to make them useless. That tactic reminds me of freshman college bull sessions where mushy young minds are just discovering their freedoms.
I appreciate his effort to convince us all and some that feminists are responsible for his miserable approach to women in general,
My approach to women is to give them the "equality" they claim they want and don't have.
You'd be surprised how many thinking women understand this and indeed, some of my links should have apprised you of this.
theories that came from zimmy or some other
crazy hater who provides links cause he can on the internet.
Yes indeed, providing proof from internet links is indeed a terrible thing. You need to work on your self introspection and attempt to accept facts that disagree with your 'feelings' about how things really are.
As far as I am aware, feminist are against any form of force and support equality, t
I see your problem. You don't have enough real information so you don't understand my points. Hope this helps;
feministcritics.org/blog/2009/06/08/feminists-deny-truth-on-domestic-violence-noh/
From the link:
"Since the 1970s, feminists have used domestic violence as one of their edged weapons against men. They present it as a women's issue, one in which only women are victims."I can quote lots of feminists who also either deny or minimize domestic violence against men. That has been my bone of contention; indeed, my sole purpose regards DV is to point out that men are also affected and that virtually all help in the form of shelters and money only goes to women. Women like you don't 'get it' when it comes to these issues.
if it is all theories why do men avoid marriage now more and more?
Here's what has been happening (written by one of the new wave of enlightened women).
From the link:
"Nowadays, for many men, the negatives of marriage for men often outweigh the positives." I recommend reading Patrick's contribution which puts the shoe on the other foot. Only a bigoted woman cannot see the truth in this.
Brokeback mountain must be Zimmy's favorite film.
Actually, it is David Leans' "Lawrence of Arabia"(1962). Magnificently done.
Bless feminism.Just kidding.
Well, bless it for exposing the dark side of (some) women. Light disinfects although it is painful to the 'stubborn sisters' who love gabbing about their 'victimology' which they find empowering.
