there're too many jokes about cuckolds. Is there any man who is brave enough to say his wife is 100% loyal to him ? Look at the kids, some of them do not look like you, or her, at all.
I'd say there are so few of these your point stands. As far as kids go, before any enter the picture I'd make any woman agree to paternity testing of absolutely all of them. If she says no she has something to hide, and if she says yes, you never have to worry about being cuckolded. That's how I'd try to neutralize the entire issue.
As for actual infidelities, I figure it's best to always give her the freedom to cheat. That will tend to earn you the same freedom, regardless if you ever act on that or even leave the house. It shows confidence, and that same freedom can give you confidence to be a dominant man.
So, gg4, I'd suggest that dominance can be another area you can work on. It's something that the Pure Brain can develop in many different ways. Come to think of it, rather like how Bruce Lee developed Jeet Kune Do in order to realize his personal method.
In my experience, women get wet over dominance. Once they're already turned on and warmed up, it becomes a lot easier to please them.king polkakamon
Of course there are polish women who like to be punished for their out of order behaviour but they usually prefer german dungeons
What a coincidence. I happen to be ethnically German.gg4
I guess you're a beautiful, successful woman, determined, work hard, overcome obstacles, pursuing goals, strong character. Other women may not be that lucky, and they may look for security in a relationship, not satisfaction.
OK, here your logic fails. On top of your defensive tone, you suggest you are aiming for an ugly woman who is failing, apathetic, lazy, defeated, listless, and of weak character. In your defense, being a provider is a good thing, but it can be a delicate game to not make it look like you're trying to buy her, or that you have nothing else to offer.
An escape hatch for you could be to share her sexually. That means bringing alternative lifestyles into your marriage, but, it would also be like letting your kids and their friends come over and occasionally get drunk. At least the party is at your house, where you can keep an eye on things and not let them get any more out of control. I'd never do this, but then I'd be careful never to marry someone where that really could be necessary.gg4
How about sex? How about "physical attractiveness" and "physical chemistry" ? Do you mean I can only buy her heart with these, not money?
You suggest that if a woman prefers attractiveness or chemistry, she is merely selling out for a different kind of coin. The problem here is that a market value is only established if both sides can agree on it first. Here it seems the majority disagree with you.
My opinion is that a woman has various inputs, and the importance she places on each input depends on the individual girl. You apply to these inputs as best you can, and if you can reach that certain threshold, which only she knows (unless you can read her), you have a chance to succeed.
GG4: I do not need a "good girl" who doen't want sex. Sex is the basic need of a relationship, without sex it's not a relationship. We do not need to mention it, because it's already obvious. So, it's worth to talk about other needs of a relationship - which is security, and more. If you focus ONLY on sex, it's a sexual relation, not a relationship.
There is a sad irony here. The argument in this thread is focused like a laser on sex with her. Shouldn't she be equally focused on that issue, in a positive way, in order for there to be true reciprocity?