Not all. So?
So I told you. Did you miss it? The state administered penalty of caning is unavoidable while violence in prison not necessarily.
That was a figure of speech.
Was or wasn`t. You tend to be quite verbatim when you use your comparisons so I prefered to take your words at face value.
Pretending that the threat of violence is not a deterrent
If it was such a deterrent, people would behave like angels and hardly nobody would commit crimes and go to prison. But it doesn`t work this way - prisons in the US or Poland are packed. Why? Probaby those convicts didn`t contact you and don`t realise they should feel deterred by potential violence from inmates. hahaha
this debating technique for the children
Funny that you accuse me of such techniques while you are exploiting kindergarten tricks yourself all the time.
In the adult world, certain things are what we call axiomatic
Yes, certain. But not all. I have just shown it to you and if you reject those logical explanations above, you prove you are unreasonable. Simple.