@Feniks
Not really. Look, that is a moot point.
I don't even know why we are talking about it. It's not an issue I'm debating.
It just is so laudably incorrect, and your quotes are written by people with minds polluted with feminist ideology.
At the time, slavery was still a reality, and a wife was a wife, not a slave or property; if you try to tell me in this way that women had no equal rights with men.
Yes, of course, I'm not contesting it, nor should equality be foremost on your mind. Those historical issues you'd better leave to someone who has a better grasp of them. As you present your limited and biased point of view, based on extensive literature by feminist authors. Such takes only induce unwarranted victimhood in women. That's ugly and cheap, don't let it mess with your head.
----
Ah, I remember now, the reason we are talking about chattel is that my point of view as to nonintervention of the law into marital relations was compared to chattel, i.e., slavery, by you. It is a logical fallacy.
Don't make yourself look silly anymore, please. Bisade Atch, you are the only woman poster on PF that seems worthy to debate, don't spoil my fun by being a typical feminist, a brainwashed modern clueless woman.
---
Really? Who cares? It is a little funny that you gather those little tidbits to prove that women are up to par. Does that make you feel better?
Why would you feel bad in the first place?
I tell you why.
It is due to feminism that it induced women to compete with men; that is ridiculous. Each gender has its own strengths and weaknesses. You should aim to be the best woman you can be, and you won't achieve it if you give in to feminist propaganda and try to become a man without a dick.
-----
I'm pretty sure you would be attracted more to a Neanderthal than a femboy. Don't fret about it. LOL!
-----
Scratch Russian and I agree.
However, I must clarify that my critique is from the perspective of an insider, to get things back on the right track. Meanwhile, your Russian agent is simply spewing venom with his barbaric glee. His intentions are not pure.
a woman was considered her husband's property
Not really. Look, that is a moot point.
I don't even know why we are talking about it. It's not an issue I'm debating.
It just is so laudably incorrect, and your quotes are written by people with minds polluted with feminist ideology.
At the time, slavery was still a reality, and a wife was a wife, not a slave or property; if you try to tell me in this way that women had no equal rights with men.
Yes, of course, I'm not contesting it, nor should equality be foremost on your mind. Those historical issues you'd better leave to someone who has a better grasp of them. As you present your limited and biased point of view, based on extensive literature by feminist authors. Such takes only induce unwarranted victimhood in women. That's ugly and cheap, don't let it mess with your head.
----
Ah, I remember now, the reason we are talking about chattel is that my point of view as to nonintervention of the law into marital relations was compared to chattel, i.e., slavery, by you. It is a logical fallacy.
Don't make yourself look silly anymore, please. Bisade Atch, you are the only woman poster on PF that seems worthy to debate, don't spoil my fun by being a typical feminist, a brainwashed modern clueless woman.
---
the highest percentage in Europe of women
Really? Who cares? It is a little funny that you gather those little tidbits to prove that women are up to par. Does that make you feel better?
Why would you feel bad in the first place?
I tell you why.
It is due to feminism that it induced women to compete with men; that is ridiculous. Each gender has its own strengths and weaknesses. You should aim to be the best woman you can be, and you won't achieve it if you give in to feminist propaganda and try to become a man without a dick.
-----
suit your neanderthal views.
I'm pretty sure you would be attracted more to a Neanderthal than a femboy. Don't fret about it. LOL!
-----
would make a great Russian secret services agent.
Scratch Russian and I agree.
However, I must clarify that my critique is from the perspective of an insider, to get things back on the right track. Meanwhile, your Russian agent is simply spewing venom with his barbaric glee. His intentions are not pure.

