Poland's birthrate on the decline

Well, that's what Karens do. Like when she starts playing Nancy Drew from across the Atlantic..Apparently even Scotland Yard can't match her detective skills. Lol.

Why should I read the entire discussion? Most of it seems like a rant, and not everyone has unlimited time. Many people are addicted to encyclopedias, having a compulsive desire to present themselves as someone they are not. Some crave megalomania, while most of us simply want to find useful information and comment on it, ignoring the irrelevant pages of nonsense. What's wrong with what I consider a healthy approach?

She's not a Karen.

She is standing up to 4-5 guys.

She is a Slavic warrior - maybe not of the sort we want - but she is.

If you want to make fun of Paulina, I would invite you to also make fun of me - but where me and you are at least in the same parking lot.

Then we can quickly see who means what.

Why?
Two adults who decide to be together should be able to sort out their issues by themselves without involving taxpayers. The state should draw a line on open wounds, internal injuries, or this level of violence; short of that, it's your problem. Learn to be an adult, sort out your issues. No nanny state that does it for you.
What's wrong with it?

I don't think it is. I mean, let's assume for the sake of debate that I'm advocating that the so-called category in law of marital rape should be abolished. What a big deal?
So her disrespectful attempt at interrogation and personal insult has no place here, what a *****!

In order to find out more. I dig deep. Always in pursuit of knowledge about human nature :)


Guys, I know you're butthurt, but kicking the stinky asses of MAGAts, misogynists and other morons doesn't make anyone a "Karen" - you're clearly confused about the meaning of this term :)))


Nah, I wouldn't go that far :D


Noone asked you to.

Paulina, even the best psychiatrist would struggle to diagnose psychopathy based on just a few posts that you may not find agreeable. While you have the right to disagree, it's not acceptable to make unfounded insults. I find Ironside to be interesting, informative, and true to his beliefs, with no signs of mental instability. Are you a medical doctor or a mental health professional?

Not when a crime takes place. Rape is a crime.


So are you advocating it or not? You don't even have the balls to state clearly and openly what you think/want? lol


Poor iron snowflake can't handle a few questions xD ❄️


If someone talks like a psycho, then I call him a psycho, sorry, not sorry. 💁

Well, we've been discussing with Ironside for years. So that's not just a few posts. Besides, he himself wrote at one point that he probably is a sociopath.


And who decides whether those insults are unfounded or not? You've yourself hurled a lot of insults and nasty comments at people on this forum over the years. Were they all justified? I'm guessing that you think they were.

Besides, calling Ironside a "psychopath" wasn't an insult on my part. That's simply my personal opinion about him and not an official medical diagnosis.

People condoning rape are not normal in my opinion. You disagree with this sentiment?


We have a different opinion then.

I know you are very good at drawing various paintings.

You have exquisite aesthetic taste...

But I will try to convince you - leave rape to others.

@Bobko, for God's sake, what the hell is your problem now? Don't you have anything better to do than policing what I write about?


What does that even mean? I'm supposed to leave it to you - men? Thanks to that we got what's represented now in the Epstein files. 🙄🤦

@Paulina

[quote=Paulina]I "see you didn't even bother to read the whole discussion. It's really getting tiresome and"..[/quote]
Well, Paulia, the above quote, your own words, so you ask, or at least suggest reading the whole discussion.Besides,when replying, it is advisable to comment on the whole post, not a few selected words, because it makes the original post and your answer meaningless and misleading. When will you realise that I am not your enemy, we often disagree, so what?

Those words of mine were addressed to BB, not to you.

I investigated some rapes in my life - and I don't understand why any normal, sane, adjusted person would want to discuss this topic with me?

Rape is literally a 1/1000 occurrence, where us uniformed men (depending on the specific context at the time), are forced to come and interview you about it all.

Usually - you want us to do something about it. And for the next few days that nothing happens, you leave us messages amounting to "I want that f*cker dead".

"Very helpful ma'am, but please let us complete our work."

When we find him, and say - "we can string him up by the balls, or we can organize for him to be raped anally for the next 20,990 days" - you usually come crying, saying - "you can't rape him, or leave him without teeth or a penis - I LOVE HIM!!!"

Basically - decide - do you want him tortured and killed, or you want to receive him at home where you will rock him to sleep, and whisper into his ear how terrible the people were who found him.

Being a Slavic warrior has nothing to do with rape and relationships between men and women. Stop philosophizing, get your feet on the ground, and don't embarrass yourself.

I won't hear this from your coward ass - that has never risked itself once. I have a good understanding of who you are.

Are you retarded? Which part of my post went over your head? I guess you object; I know that you want to have a nanny state catering to women.
---

I'm still thinking about it. It is not a top priority for me; it is somewhere at the bottom of my list.
--

No, Ironside doesn't like to engage with pscho-biatch. If you wipe the floor with her, there's an army of simps at your ankles. If you let her get bold, she doesn't have a bottom line and doesn't know when to stop. There is no win-win situation, and over some trifle, it's not worth it.
----

Fine, I hope you will not have an issue with me calling you stupid then.

Dear Bobko, the discussion about marital rape started after you wrote a post in defence of some of the men here, including Ironside. You wrote:


After that I asked you if you saw Ironside's comments about marital rape. And that's how it started. So we're not so much discussing rape, as Ironside's (and other men's) views on marital rape. OK?


So you're a "uniformed man" now? I thought you're running a business of some kind or sth? 🤨


I honestly have no idea what your story has to do with me participating in this discussion.

What is the difference? Oh, I forgot that you are a woman and can choose when and where your words apply to others.

For several years - I wore a uniform, that obligated me to help - amongst others - women that were attacked.

Contrary to what you wrote - I have been writing about my uniformed service since at least 2018.

If you don't pay attention to the forum it's not my fault.

-://-

In confirmation of what you wrote, one time you wrote me a message when I still was uniformed, and you compared me to an SS Officer.

I wrote you a lot then, saying how hurtful this comparison was to me.

Other people on the forum also know of my work (no - not a KGB agent!!), and can confirm I maintain the same humanist line when I argue topics.

Interesting, for you, that distinction is meaningless. You are dishonest here.
In fact, I think you're upset because your feminist worldview and taboo have been questioned.

Putting rapists into prison isn't "having a nanny state catering to women," psycho. And in case you didn't know - rapists tend to have more than one victim over the years. So sending a rapist to prison can save future potential victims.


OMG... Then let me know once you decide. 🤦


No, you simply got yourself into a nasty pile of sh1t and you tried to get out of it without smelling like sh1t, because a few people gathered and pointed out that you're standing in a pile of sh1t by your knees so you started feeling stupid.


Is "wiping the floor with me" in the room with us? :D 😂😂😂


You've been doing that on regular basis for a long time already.

The difference is that I was talking to BB and I wanted him to read the whole discussion, because he was making claims that weren't correct. So, those words of mine weren't directed to the whole forum, but only to one person - BB.


So why are you attacking me now out of the blue? What did I do to you?


OK, I haven't seen those comments then.


No, I'm not. You're talking nonsense just to argue now. 🤦

You can count on it. So, how is your jump from the dangerous height of six feet coming along? Are you at least 1% closer to mastering one-handed push-ups?

I wish we could face each other: you, the youthful and arrogant Kalmuk, representing a physical threat, and I, over sixty years old (at least according to you, with no right to speak or even be alive). As a Polish patriot, I would gladly risk such an encounter just for the pleasure of silencing your mouth full of Russian propaganda.

To be honest, my whole life has been one long, risk-taking adventure.

Well, well... I just remebered how you wrote that you didn't care if the guy who shot Renee Good was guilty or not. And how you "couldn't understand" why I care how many times he shot and from which side, etc. I was surprised that someone who studied law (as far as I remember) would be so oblivious to such issues. But this new info shows you in even worse light for me...

Yeah, Paulina,so what?


Correcting false statements is not the same as attacking. For reasons I won't discuss, I feel sad about the situation. I assure you, I am not trying to be cruel.

So why are you behaving as if I was talking to you or the whole forum?


What "false statements" did I make?

You don't know anything at all.,about me.

Paulina, it doesn't matter; this is a public forum. You and I can comment on the contents of any post without exception, as there is no exclusivity in a public forum.

quote=Paulina]What "false statements" did I make?[/quote]
Your not serious, to numerous to mention.

Yes, we can. That's not what I'm talking about though. You asked me: "Why should I read the entire discussion?" in response to my comment directed to BB. So I explained it to you that I asked BB to read the whole discussion, not you. I didn't ask you to read the whole discussion. Do you understand?


So what "false statement" of mine were you "correcting" when you wrote this?:

"Oh, I forgot that you are a woman and can choose when and where your words apply to others."