The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Tacitus  

Joined: 6 Jul 2017 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - Q
Last Post: 18 Oct 2025
Threads: Total: 2 / Live: 1 / Archived: 1
Posts: Total: 1428 / Live: 971 / Archived: 457

Displayed posts: 972 / page 33 of 33
sort: Oldest first   Latest first   |
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

stop letting the useless workshy into Europe in the first place

Any suggestions how that would work? The countries outside Europe won't keep them, and once they enter Europe, they have the right to due process.

The UK is an island, left the EU and was led by the Tories for many years, yet the number of new arrivals was 100k or so last years. If you can't keep them from reaching the UK, you won't be able to prevent them from reaching Italy.

how are countries supposed to keep them

Like I wrote above. Simply register them and take them back if they turn up in a different country asking for welfare. Once it becomes clear that they can't pick their host country, they'll stay put. Simple.

We are no rich, well functioning country anymore

We are richer and better run than more than 95% of the planet. Just a reminder to keep things in perspective.

Then why are you insisting to carry on all these things which make the AfD bigger and bigger?

I don't want to "carry on". On the contrary it is my belief that we need drastic changes hence my insistence on a European solution and my praise for the changes already implemented by the Merz government. But I am also a realist who knows that there are limits to what we can achieve. Migration is a reality and we will never get the number of non-European refugees down to where they were in the 20th century. That is simply not going to happen. And I am not of fan of making promises that can not be fullfilled. What I hope happens is that we reduce the numbers sufficiently that we can properly with them again. But I doubt it will go down much further than 100k new arrivals per year.

No longer a reason to travel half the world, wandering through dozens

How many of those "safe" countries even offer that? If you live in a refugee camp in Libanon, even those basic utilities will look like luxuries to you. Most of the "pull factors" we have like education and basic healthcare aren't things we can take off the table.

I used to think that this might make a difference. But after I learned how life for many Afghans is like, even before the Taliban retook power, especially in rural areas. Living in small huts with no electricity or running water, no access to medicine or schools, no job prospects. Honestly, even if you reduced everything to bed, bred and soap for rejected refugees, they still wouldn't leave.
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

KONTROLLVERLUST

A bit melodramatic. A government can also fight e.g. crime, but will never be able to prevent all crimes or identify and punish all criminals. But as long as it does everything it reasonably can and achieve satisfactory results, that is enough for most people. That is what our government should be aiming for.

Thing is my grandparents didn't chose to travel to Libanon

They were fortunate to have a country nearby that accepted them and offered them a decent shot at life. What is your point? That the Syrians in Libanon should have immediately made their way towards Europe instead?

A true refugee is grateful for the barest necessities

This is such an unrealistic take on people. Yes, people are initially immensely grateful if they are out of harms way and receive very basic accomodations. But if they are stuck in tents for years, with no job opportunities, no chance for their children to even receive a basic education, no chance of integration and no realistic perspective of returning to their home, they'll consider leaving.

Just a reminder. You had people in the GDR risking their lifes while trying to enter the FRG, even though the differences between the standard of living between the two countries was significantly lower than between the FRG and a refugee camp in Libanon. Because they did not see a future for themselves there.

Btw. There are documentaries about German refugees after WWII who were forced to live in tent camps for years. They were interviewed there, and they usually didn't say "we are so happy to be still alive" but that they dislike their current living situation, that they want proper homes and schools for their children. Of course they did not have other places to go since most of Europe was still destroyed.

Lets' not pretend that refugees are self-sufficient to the point of abandoning all wants and needs.
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

The shop owner is btw a man whose first name is "Hans". Not a popular name amongst muslim migrants I might add.

You are not seriously comparing them to some afghan, syrian or north african immigrant

Maybe not with refugees from many African countries who flee from poverty. But people from Syria and Afghanistan are usually accepted as refugees, hence a valid comparison.

no illegal immigration from far away countries!

Even if that was true. Clear-cut immigration makes only for a small share amongst the refugees. I think Ukrainians, Syrians and Afghans - all genuine refugees - make up for more than 80% of the cases last time I checked. So even if implemented, we would not see a decrease to a degree that would make you satisfied.
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

No pull factors = no illegal immigration from far away countries!

Again, we won't be able to reduce the "pull factors" to the degree that wouldn't make it appealing for people to come if the alternative is a refugee in Libanon. Things like basic health care and schooling are things people are willing to risk their life for.
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

I hear nowadays from the ruling people that usual "we can't

I mean yeah, they also probably don't want to be monsters. But is it really so difficult for you to understand why things like basic health care and schooling will never be cut (and indeed doing so would be directly be against our interest). We dont want people not going to a doctor if they have a possibly contagious disease, and not allowing their children to go to school was one mistake which we made with the Gastarbeiter generation.
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

with them in a ruling coalition, there would be no cutting off support for Israel!

You are again projecting your personal wishes on the AfD.

"Germany: AfD leader rejects arms exports and 'one-sided' support for Israel
Germany's AfD party leadership is against sending weapons to Israel and calling for an end to the "one-sided partisanship" in support of the country

rmx.news/article/germany-afd-leader-rejects-arms-exports-and-one-sided-support-for-israel-calls-for-end-to-blanket-islamophobia/

The AfD shows solidarity with jews when they can use it to agitate against muslims.
Tacitus   
20 Sep 2025
News / Germany's Socio-Political Climate and Its Impact on Poland [122]

.similiar like the point about Putin and the Ukraine wa

There is no split on Ukraine and Putin, that is just your projection. Just look at what the party leadership is actually saying on the subject.
Tacitus   
7 Oct 2025
News / Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 25 [1150]

offer them and consistently pressured Ukraine into that sh!t Minsk agreement

Say what you want about Merkel, but helping to broker the Minsk agreement was realistically the best that she could do at this point.

Remember, the reason why she went to Minsk (with Hollande) was because the USA and the UK refused or were unable to meaningfully support Ukraine (despite having signed the Budapest memorandum).

The Ukrainian army was close to a collapse, and no Western country was willing to support Ukraine in a meaningful way. Minsk avoided a complete Ukrainian defeat and bought the country time to reform itself and get into a position to successfully defend itself years later.
Tacitus   
8 Oct 2025
News / Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 25 [1150]

A new proposal was to let the Russian have a free rein in Ukraine

Source? Merkel said that she wanted to save the Minsk II format, which would have left Ukraine in a much better situation than it is right now.

Russian interference in the Baltic states and Poland were not on her radar

Worth remembering that Russia/Ukraine was but one of several European crisis she had to deal with, often simultaneously.

In 2015 she not only had to broker Minsk II, but also deal with Greek Tsipras government who came close to tanking the Euro and then later bailed out Southern Europe and yet again when she did not close the borders to the refugees arriving via Italy/Balkans. Then the came the Brexit fiasco and the Covid crisis.

Sure, in hindsight it appears that Putin/Russia is the one existential threat, but this was far from obvious when she was chancellor. An assessment pretty much all of Western Europe shared at the time.
Tacitus   
18 Oct 2025
News / Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 25 [1150]

.instead getting back what we lost, every lost war made us smaller, left us less land

Indeed. The Palistinians need a leader like Brandt who acknowledges that what has been lost will never again be theirs, and instead consolidate what they still have. Sadly such a leader is no-where in sight.