Tacitus
2 Apr 2024
News / Poland`s aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 10 [1806]
@PolAmKrakow
Adviika was a heavily fortified city that caused the Russian a near endless amount of grief. The amount of losses the Russians sufferes in its' capture are likely the main reason why they could not further capitalize on the shortage of ammunition for the Ukrainians.
And the Europeans, if not in the same quantity yet.
Nonsense. The Russians still have the edge in terms of quantity. We are e.g. talking about what, 20-40 F 16? Those will aid in the defence of Ukrainian air space, but will hardly suffice in establishing air superiority in Russian-held territory.
Nobody expects the USA to fight in Ukraine. All that it is asked to is to spend a tiny percentage of its' military budget on hardware it has produced and in many cases is not using (meaning the money stays in the USA) and send it to Ukraine where it greatly aids American strategic interests. Not to mention that this has become a great advertisement for American weapons, (is there better advertisement for a Bradley then the video of one shooting the cr*p out of a Russian T-90, or for a Patriot system shooting down one Russian missile and plane after another?). We can already see the benefits for the American arms industry in the many new orders for F-36, Himars, Patriots, Abrams and so on. This aid to Ukraine is not charity. It is an investment that is already paying off for the USA.
The EU is doing all the costly stuff, namely humanitarian, financial and economical aid. Which is of course also in its' interest, but won't return results that are as visible (since Ukraine likely wont be able and or asked to repay those).
@PolAmKrakow
and not wasted lives and equipment on Avdiika when it was not an essential or strategic position.
Adviika was a heavily fortified city that caused the Russian a near endless amount of grief. The amount of losses the Russians sufferes in its' capture are likely the main reason why they could not further capitalize on the shortage of ammunition for the Ukrainians.
The US sent so much
And the Europeans, if not in the same quantity yet.
and all the new volume of weapons, a breakthrough is expected.
Nonsense. The Russians still have the edge in terms of quantity. We are e.g. talking about what, 20-40 F 16? Those will aid in the defence of Ukrainian air space, but will hardly suffice in establishing air superiority in Russian-held territory.
US though has been fighting
Nobody expects the USA to fight in Ukraine. All that it is asked to is to spend a tiny percentage of its' military budget on hardware it has produced and in many cases is not using (meaning the money stays in the USA) and send it to Ukraine where it greatly aids American strategic interests. Not to mention that this has become a great advertisement for American weapons, (is there better advertisement for a Bradley then the video of one shooting the cr*p out of a Russian T-90, or for a Patriot system shooting down one Russian missile and plane after another?). We can already see the benefits for the American arms industry in the many new orders for F-36, Himars, Patriots, Abrams and so on. This aid to Ukraine is not charity. It is an investment that is already paying off for the USA.
The EU is doing all the costly stuff, namely humanitarian, financial and economical aid. Which is of course also in its' interest, but won't return results that are as visible (since Ukraine likely wont be able and or asked to repay those).