History /
Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]
Ozi Dan
The more relevant back stab was, in my view, the failure of HMG to tell Poland about the critical issues materialising out of Teheran, not to mention HMG’s craven acquiescence to Stalin. The backstab is even more serious because it was in breach, and in contempt, of HMG’s obligation to tell Poland (per Art. 5 of the Treaty) of any development that would threaten Poland’s independence.
Why can't you learn that a lie constantly repeated does not become the truth: instead it simply is repeatedly exposed as a lie so that more and more people know that it is a lie.
Could you please be so kind as to quote the parts of the relevant agreements which show that, given that the British and Americans had secured a promise from Stalin that there would be a Polish state and that there would be free and fair elections in Poland open to all parties other than the fascists, Poland’s independence was threatened. Either that or stop telling your latest pathetic lie.
Ozi Dan
Consequently, Poland was unaware that it was to be subject to significant and prejudicial changes to its borders and socio political makeup after the dust settled on WW2.
Which allied leader first proposed moving Poland’s borders to their current western location? Oh yes, it was General Władysław Sikorski. But in your world Poland was unaware that her borders would change.
Ozi Dan
when Anders sought release of Polish forces to fight their way back home
‘Excuse me but we’d like to go start WWIII. Is that alright with you?’
Ozi Dan
The story of HMG’s treachery toward Poland in WW2 is that simple.
Actually it is far simpler, it is as simple as can be; after all, what can be simpler than something which does not exist?