The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by NomadatNet  

Joined: 28 Mar 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 11 Aug 2011
Threads: 1
Posts: Total: 457 / Live: 450 / Archived: 7

Speaks Polish?: No

Displayed posts: 451 / page 7 of 16
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
History / What was it like in 1989+ in Poland when the Soviet house of cards fell? [237]

So, Poles, especially older than 30+ years, were you happier before 1989 or are you happier now?

(I had many friends from other former Soviet countries during those days and they were happy for a year or two and then, they started to miss old days, they had started to say old days were better when they experienced capitalist system health care, etc etc. I have not met them anymore since 1995-96.)
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Ok, I am not knowledgable about car models. but, know dyamics.
Looking at its picture in the first post, the nose design could be better from aerodynamic point of view. This nose may cause some air turbulence at the front and it may result in more fuel consumption. But, anyway, it seems that this will be in luxury car class which fuel consumption won't be minded by the owner.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Yes. And, overall efficiency is improved as well. All needed is turbocharger, and a small modification of exhaust system, particularly exhaust manifold which needs to be resistant to high temperature (high nickel alloy) which is expensive part of modification. (I had casted several such exhaust manifolds and machined some years ago. if anyone interested in, can do that again. if there is volume order. if not, if only a unit or two, i can make exhaust manifold with welded pipes made of chromium steel alloy. )
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

What do you mean? To get 4 kwh by heat pump, 1 kwh is spent? So, 3 kwh is a plus. Are you saying heat pump is useless due to its low efficiency in general or in some circumferences? It is known sure. But, efficiency calculation, in other better words, philosophy behind the efficiency is not so correct. When something is free everywhere, efficiency of it doesn't become important anymore. In the case of petrol, for ex, which is not available everywhere, efficiency becomes important due to its limited amount of petrol.

Another thing, another problem is the energy needed, energy needed to drive the system in the world today which is like a super balloon unnecessarily is of course big, and, a big portion of energy being used today is wasted for unnecessary items such as warplanes, big engine cars, etc etc. Natural energy sources will be enough to drive a natural life. Heat pump, photovoltaics, wind energy technologies, etc etc will be enough to provide a natural life. When such energies are used more often, petrolium will be less important for energy need as petrolium will be used more for items such as plastics, etc. If we are focused on petrolium, gas, etc more, I know those resource owners will be happy as world will be dependent on them, but, then, there will be wars more and more for such energy sources concentrated on some regions. When people stay away from such energy sources like petrol, etc those people who captured such energy sources like oil, gas, etc can find themselves in marsh. Then, those oil, gas, etc lords will try to save themselves out of marsh and will try to share those resources too with the rest of the world and this will make the world a globalized social world..

For sure... ;) In germany, companies that have wind generator farms complain that solar energy producers consume 40% of total state subsidies amount producing only 10% of "green" electricity. ;).

40% of state subsidies consumption for 10% of green electricity?
What do you mean here? You mean money is spent much for little energy?
It is due to the material costs and high material costs are due to unnecessary use/waste everywhere in the world. World is not being drived by knowledgable people, but, by priests, imams, monarchies etc even in technology fields. Then, such illogical things happen even in technologies. Where there is no, for ex, petrol, that little energy by wind is very important and its price must be as gold price, under these non-global asocial world, if you understand what I mean.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

I have experience with installation and servicing solar-powered telemetry units in climate of central Russia. So, I'm not enthusiastic at all about PV (except in african deserts).

I am not knowledgable much about them PV systems, but, I feel it is under-developed field. With transferring the budget of petrolium researches and technologies which will also reduce military budgets much, I can think of some good developments in photovoltaic systems. New generations will be focusing on such studies like PV systems more. Our era is almost over.

But where you'll get energy to power heat pumps? Even if new developments will make heat pumps reasonably cheap, reliable and not containing either poisonous, ozone depleting or highly flammable/explosive liquids.

Energy to power heat pumps? For example, air itself surrounding the house is the huge energy source. You know energy isn't only dependent to the temperature, but also volume/mass. Source, air for ex, has huge mass and this makes energy in the air even at low temperatures is huge actually. Or, soil, or sea, etc. This is main principle of heat pumps. Sure, there are still some problems such as with the fluids used in heat pumps, but, with more researches, with more budgets to such natural energy sources, heat pumps too will be developed further.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Solar electric can be obtained directly by solar light, by pv, photovoltaic panels, you know, it doesn't need solar heat like it exists in deserts of Suudi.

Heating the house is another issue. As I said above, heat pumps can be used and by this way, Norway can be heated even by the snow and ice.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Yes, possible, but, solar energy won't be so popular for heating houses as solar energy is not continous, not homogeneous everywhere in the world for heating houses. For houses, heat pump systems will be more popular. You know heat pumps can be used for heating as well as cooling and its energy source can be air, soil, sea, etc which are huge potential energy sources even at low temperatures. For example, a -5 celcius air can be used to heat the house to +10, +15 celcius.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

I foresee solar powered electric cars rather than cars with batteries charged at electric stations with electric coming from nuclear/thermonuclear systems. Okay, with solar power, the speed of cars won't be so fast, but, will be enough especially in city traffics. For intercity transportations, trains, airplanes, helicopters, etc will be more dominant. I foresee there won't be intercity roads anymore.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Main problem, since last century when petrol engined vehicles entered the dailylife, has been that big portion of research budgets have been spent on such petrolium engines and vehicles. If the same amount of efforts and money were spent on electric vehicles, today, we could have seen very different, powerful electric cars and vehicles. It has been a waste of time due to oil politics globally as the global powers forced science and technology to be dependent to the oil/petrol. Now, they started to understand they are on the wrong way and everybodys thinking alternatives and main alternative is electric power. From now on, a new century, a new era is starting, and the main power will be electric.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Hm...
Why vast majority of people prefer real sex to any adult toys money can buy? ;)

Ha? You say electric cars are toys unlike oil engine cars/motors?
Not at all. Oil engined motors are toys, electric motors will be much more powerful in the near future, you will see.. Don't we already know heaviest vehicles, which are trains, are electric powered?
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

Electric power is all very well , and good for the environment , but whizzing down the road on my Harley with only the sound of an electric motor...?

With electric power, you can simulate any car or motor voice including Harley's, even bird voices.. Record voices into a tape and add power loud speakers at the rear of electric car, nobody will understand it is petrolium engined Harley or electric car.
NomadatNet   
27 May 2011
News / Poland reveals its new super car. [56]

World is giving up petrolium engined cars for electric powered cars and Poland is investing on a luxury petrolium car? We can see it in museum in a few years without being used much.
NomadatNet   
24 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

Eh, everybody who has a car is interested in oil and they pay money for the oil to get it. When it is considered like that, oil is another business - but, when it is considered as somethings that can be taken by weapons, it is no more business, not civil business. And, oil and military industries have been huge portion of such global issues since last century and in such industries, Jews and other civil people are out..

FED is a part of monetary system. Owner of monetary systems are owner of central banks which credit the gold more than the money as central banks don't trust ordinary people and their elected governments and central banks are under the control of deep states, or monarchies.. Saying some ordinary folks who have become successful within their rules of monarchies don't make them more powerful than deep states and monarchies. At the end, you too have a chance to become successful and rich within the rules of monarchies, but, you don't have any chance to be member of a monarchy.. Not that people are interested in becoming a part or a member of monarchy, but, they sometimes do not do good things, civil things for ordinary people and since they are rulers, they are above the rules, they don't pay any cost when they do not do good things, unlike civil business people like Jews, and others.. Showing Jews so powerful is due to their fears of monarchies who spread fears to ordinary people too, using the ideologies, cultural differences, etc..
NomadatNet   
24 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

As an ethnic group the Jews have gained a disproportionate amount of power in world affairs. The Jews only constitute 0.2% percent of the world population, and yet they control the Federal Reserve and Bank of England and run the two institutions as private companies.

False. It is like saying Einstein, one person only, influenced whole world in science. Monetary field is like that. You see only influential people while you are blind to millions of researchers, academicans, etc who don't produce real things, but, get their salaries lazily. And, with democracy controlled by such works at universities too, science does not progress as much as Einsteins do..

If Federal Reserve and Bank of England don't know the monetary system which is actually their own system of their own monarchies who don't care about even their own ordinary people, ordinary people complaining about people who are civils unlike monarchies who control the resources belonging to ordinary people are not doing any different than monarchies. Money is printed by states and they are in their control of deep states with weapon powers, not in their control of people you call Jews.. Jews have only a very small land, called Israel while monarchies have huge lands.. You are made blind by those who own huge lands doing nothing, living lazily and a small community working hard and those lazy people like Arap kingdoms and Britain monarchies are showing these hard worker minority as target.. But, anyway, they don't care ordinary folks, either.. These computers were not made by monarchies, dictators, etc but by working people like Jews..
NomadatNet   
24 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

Becoming general manager of a company doesn't make you owner of company.
However, USA is not a monarchy like Britain or Arap monarchies, so, there is a chance for every individual unlike monarchic states.
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

@Legend,
Make a list of Italian ethnic Americans, it can be longer.
Bank of America is one huge company for ex.
No need to make a list of Britain ethnic Americans, the list can not fit this internet page.
Showing a list of Jewish rich people may make Christian people react due to their religious feelings. They don't see the sea, but, a small lake.

Jewish Americans are the most powerful and influential ethnic group in America. Jewish Americans make up 2 percent of the U.S. population yet comprise 40 percent of U.S. billionaires.

But, when you say this (or Stein writes this), it is interesting data.
2% of 300 million people own 40% of billionaires?
Somethings wrong with this.
Jewish Americans are in civil fields such as media, engineering, finance, etc - they are not in oil field and military industry field which are two biggest industries.. So, are you (or Stein) sure about that data? 40% of billionaires are from 2% minority people? If they had control of central bank where money is printed, I could say maybe.. You won't be in in central bank, wont be in oil and military industry and you will be owning about half of big business? Somethings strange.. (likely false data.)
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

It's not always about quantity.

you probably meant here sometimes quality..
when the quality increase, the racial approach decrease.
(einstein was a single quality and it is unlikely to see any racial word from him. like that..)

so, if there is someone influential quality one there in USA who is known as Jew, he is unlikely a person as you know.

I read a source that says 50% of American billionaires are Jewish. Thats quite large for only 6 million people in the US.

Was it anti-jewish-source.com?
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

Influence? 2% are influencing 98%? Illogical. or, exaggeration. It is not a new thing, same things had been said when Jews were in Europe too before they moved to USA.

If you said one singer, say Michael Jackson, influenced whole music field, I can understand. Or, if you say one Einstein influenced whole science field, again, it can be understood. Maybe, you mean there are such influential Jews? So, what? Why hightlight/labelling suchs as Jews?
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

What is it about? About the numbers of $$$$$ ? Then, check out top 100 richest people of USA, as I said above. They are not more than 10-15 people.
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

@Legend, I am not in USA, so I don't know who is who there, details of everybody, don't know even who is who here in Turkey. Having said this,

Stein, by saying Jews are everywhere in the media, probably made fun of people who repeat the same thing over and over "Jews are big powers, own whole media, etc etc."

Fox is a big company, so, of course, Jewish intellectuals too will work there. (for ex., there are several Armenian columnists in a newspaper here known with their islaimst views of newspaper owner. It is business, money, work. Same for Fox.)

So, counting a few Jews working at Fox media doesn't make Fox as a Jewish media. Fox owner is R. Murdoch, an immigrant from Australia, a son of Irish protestant parents. And, main politics of this media is drawn by the owner of company, Murdoch.

How many newspapers, tvs, radio, etc local and country-wise are there in USA with a population of 300 million? 10,000? How many of them can be belong to Jewish Americans who are 6 million people only, 2% of total population.? Lets say, they all are intellectuals, high level educated people and with some money.. So, my rough assumption is that they can't have more than 10% of all medias in USA.. So, 90% of media are belong to non-Jewish Americans. Maybe, you Americans see them such a small minority so successful that they may look like they are everywhere, and this illusion can be even done by some anti-Jewish media to hide their own huge media by fingering at the media of a minority. But, those Jews are very rich? Check out top 100 richest people in USA then and you will see they are not more than 10%.

Anyway.. It seems that their business rivals of Jewish Americans are playing Jewish card to make a trade/profit advantages for themselves as well. Since they are playing your belief feelings as well, it is probably effective on people who are religion oriented. If you mean power? Jews are not gun-men, not military-men and they are not sitting in front of money printing machines in the central banks..
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

Not to go off-topic further, I'll answer this only.

In fact, Romans protected Jews and they went out of their way to allow them the practice of their religion.

That's true, but, rather than protection, it was due to multi-cult, multi-religion character of Roman Empire. Problem was not about religions then, but, was about a weakening, a sliding down empire where many rebels were happening everywhere in Roman Empire borders. Roman Empire seeing its collapse slowly from inside attacked outside, Jerusalem, to be able to save itself, also due to rebels in Jerusalem as well as they were not really independent.. During such a period, Jesus appeared as a rebel men leader and people of Jerusalem (Jews) gave him to Roman Empire due to their fear of the empire and Roman Empire killed him.. But, he became a phenomenan in other regions from Spain to Anatolia and we see St Paul as another rebel man in 30-40 AD who mentioned about Christ at meetings wherever he went..

So, returning to the topic by connecting these past things to near past and today, there must be no-base for the hate between Jews and Christians. If there is any base for any hate, it can be only between Christians and Roman Empire as they were the ones who had fought each others for 2 centuries and more. But, again, they were nothing else than economy fights, fight against an empire.. After that invasion of Jerusalem, Jews were, have been always a small minority and they have been shown as targets by empires of the days, even today, as they have been a weak community..
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

It is not correct. Roman Empire had many troubles inside its borders before Christ too. Its relationships between Roman Empire and Jerusalem were sometimes good, sometimes bad. All these show there were instabilities in the region of Roman Empire as well as in neighbouring region. Of course, it is not a new thing that rebellion leaders against Empires in the history were called as gods, prophets, etc (I am looking into the past from history science, not from religion point of view.) Muhammad wasn't different actually, he was another kind of rebellion against somethings else in that period, 600-650 AD, at least, at the beginning.

(Allah or Eloah is a pagan god name before Abraham religions. Same for God, which comes from Gad, Gawd, another pagan god name pre-Abraham era.)
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

I should have said "almost clear."
It is based on my analysis of those days between 50 BC and 50-100 AD.

There were revolts everywhere during this period in Roman Empire region (in Spain today as autonomous, in Anatolia, etc) as well as neighbour regions like Jerusalem region. For example, St Paul who was a tent maker in Antiochia (Antakya, Turkey today) joined a revolt in Pisidian Antiochia (West Turkey) where poor folks were breaking water ducts in the city at the hill (Christianity term first time appeared there in this Pisidian Antiochia city. Around 50 AD.) St Paul was giving reference to Christ then as he probably also visited Jerusalem years ago as Antiochia is close to Jerusalem and St Paul's first referencing to Christ was most likely about revolt things in P. Antiochia, which was later considered as preach when Christianity were spreading into the Roman Empire as religion.

They are who they say they are. Exhaustive DNA studies have proved this beyond any doubt. Why would you want to say otherwise?

No they don't. There were some whacky theories about this - those theories were never fully accepted in their day and are now completely discredited.

Okay, you say DNA studies show Askenazis are not descendant of Khazars and many Askenazi scholars say otherwise, also by giving DNA studies.

Not only Askenazi scholars, but also many other scholars from many other countries say the same, Askenazis are Khazar people. Sure, there are many who are anti-Israel and who try to make people convince in that Askenazis are Khazars so that they can claim Israeli people need to move away, out of Israel land today. But, they tell the truth like Askenazi scholars do..

(If you are an Israeli official, never mind, we here are ordinary folks and we all know official histories of all countries are partial, not exact and sometimes political. Israel being a country of Khazar people won't make, for ex, Arap kingdoms right as their roots too were somewhere else.)
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

You are talking about an entirely different thing. The issue is ancestry, not culture. It is a proven fact that the Ashkenazi Jews (or any other Jews) are NOT descended from the Khazars. That is an old piece of nonsense that was never universally accepted and is now universally debunked as nonsense.

About who Askenazis are, there is no any theory yet, that is universally accepted.. The oldest written source where you see Askenazi word is in old bible (Genesis 10:3 and I dont remember the other) and it is the name of one of three sons of Gomer grandson of Noah and his country is somewhere in the north, around Khazar sea. Based on this, religious scholars prefer to take reference to the bible only and political religionism cut it short by using its double meaning which means German Jews.

Cultural, linguistic and history studies show Askenazis moved from Khazar state after its collapse in 10th century. Sure, not universally accepted, but, there is no better theory than this theory yet..

(I can show two different DNA studies which tell different stories.)
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

DNA itself, relating to cultural identities, is a racism itself, scientific racism. Cultural identities such as Turkic, Pole, etc can not be traced by DNA studies. Anyway, this is another issue we can debate.

This was proved untrue years ago. Instead of quoting spurious websites, check out some scientific sources. You'll find links galore if you use the search function.

Proved untrue? Not at all. For example, the word Askenazi appears in written history sources first time in old bible and it's not known more than this though Hellens/Greeks claimed a lake name, an Iran/Persian historian ,n 11th c. claimed Khazar region people, etc etc. If you didn't like web site I gave, belong to an Askenazi historian, check out Wiki, you will see all theories of which none of them has been proved.

How you are talking is like talks of Israel officials. Official histories of countries may not tell a lot, or may cut short (as they do in translation/rooting of word, Askenazi as German Jewish, not to go long back in the history and to cut it short by telling their last locations.) - We here are not officials, so, our talks are purely talks of ordinary folks.

Nomad, you OK, but you got a lot confused...Jews own or control 90% US media...Jesus was not a Jew...OK.

Wrong. Jews own 10% of media, but, since there are a small minority like 6 million in 300 million, you see them as if they are everywhere..

It is not so really important if Jesus himself was a Jew or not. He was in a tribe who are named Jews even today. What is clear to me is that Jesus was a leader in a revolt against Roman Empire of the day.
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

DNA doesn't mean much for two reasons: Mixtures have happened everywhere and gene domination may change from persons to persons and calibration references of such measurements like any measurement are not clear enough. It is like taking white as pure white as reference while it is actually pink.. Furthermore, nations such as Turkic etc are not racial, but, cultural identities.

10 million of 13 million Jews today are the descendents of the Khazars and they are known as Askenazi.
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

You don't understand who controls media in the West...Please do research and then we talk...Media is the constant white noise which sinks into the sub-consciousness of the sheeple.

Lets look at the biggest medias; CNN, FOX, BBC, yahoo, etc
None of them are Jewish media.
No need to count tens of tousands of local medias belonging to non-Jew media comparing with tens of medis belonging to Jews.

You know all these.. but, you interpreate bias-ly.

Jesus Christ was not Jewish; in fact, their were no people that we now call Jews in existence at that time...There were Pharisees and Saducees: Pharisees the spiritual fathers of today's Judaism, Saducees the spiritual fathers of today's Jew elite

Whether elit or not, they were known as Jewish anyway. And, Jesus was from such parents. But, what's important is not whether Jesus was Jew or not , what's important is he was killed by Roman empire forces who were neither Jews nor there was Christianity that time as Jesus was revolting against Roman Empire. So, there is no hate actually between Jews and Christians. Neither with Muslims as they appeared 6 century later.

America has no claim to North America.

You are reading their dream of Israel about their invasion of big lands, but, when it comes to Americans or Russians, theirs are good dreams, securing those huge lands against 15 million people only while themselves are 500,000 millions and even more.

There was never a 'Jewland'...In fact, the Jews have no historical claim to any 'Israel' as Israelites disappeared from the earth thousand of years ago, and Jews are a different, Turkic people...I don't oppose the existence of Israel, but it was granted by UN Resolution, and not God.

Khazar State (6-11 th century) was a Jewish state (though other religions too existed.) Ok, they were Turkic people and their name Askenazi comes from a Turkic myth (which also appears in old Bible.) So what? Turkic people were not converted to Islam only, to Judaism as well, to Christianity as well. Europe were not Christians either till 200-300 AD.. Sure, Israel land was granted by UN, but, not for free, paid by the gold, i.e. by money. It is not different than your buying a land for your house today. Expression such as "Granted by God" is a religious term, not different than saying Church or Mosque or houses or lands in general are granted by God..

Erol (aka Nomad.)
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

US politicians are afraid of the Jews for reasons I can't fathom, but much has to do with money, blackmail and not wanting to be labeled 'Hitlers'.

You are repeating same bla bla that has been repeated everywhere. There is no logic in that 6 millions will be more powerful than 294 millions. Media power of non-Jews is 10 times more than Jewish media. Non-Jew rich people there in US are just hiding themselves against evil eyes of 300 million by putting Jews upfront so you all can blame them as you see them rich people while you don't see much more richer people behind the scenes.

For Christian Americans, this lie is pushed down their throats: Jews are God's 'chosen' and we must love them...Complete lie, as this is stated nowhere in Bible, although Jew rabbis perpetuate this to the clueless...Jews are the enemies of Christ, as they hate and mock Him...Yet, this is preached from pulpits, including Roman Catholic church.

Sure, every religious scholars talk good about their own religions, so do Jewish religious scholars, so do Christians and so on. But, history is history. Till 200-300 AD, the main hate was between Roman Empire and folks revolting against the empire. When Christianity spreaded among folks, those folks blamed Jews as they claimed Jews sold Jesus to Roman Empire forces. Jesus was a Jew anyway and he was revolting against Roman Empire. Later, when Rome became Christ-ian, they kept blaming Jews while their ancestors Romans did kill Jesus.

Today's Jewish wet dream is Eretz Yisrael from Nile to Euphrates, plus regeneration of Khazar Empire in Southern Russia...Neither will come to be..

Ah dreams.. Russia want to own whole Asia, USA want to own whole America, Britain want to own whole Europe and the world, etc. Did you see Jews were owning those places in your dream? It was a nightmare for you then.

Erol (aka Nomad.)
NomadatNet   
23 May 2011
History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

Khazar not empire?

Yes, so. There are about 15 millions Jews in the world, about 70% of them are Askenazis and 30% are Sephardis.

Khazar was empire if the empire means big, powerful state - if it means large (with states, autonomous regions, with different nations, etc inside), no, Khazar wasn't an empire.