Not stupider than your request to me for providing evidence
You are the one claiming that the USSR paid Britain for Poland: you are the one who needs to produce evidence to back that claim, otherwise it is just another one of your legion of lies.
By the way that your modus operandi on this forum
Do feel very welcome to post claims which I have made and refused to provide evidence to support.
Ask your daddy !That is a stupidest question ever even by your standards.
Why? He is not the one saying that Britain could and should have made a land attack on Germany: you are. So tell us where that attack could and should have been made before the Polish army in Poland had either surrendered or run away.
Hitler must be stopped - for example!
So the plan was to stop Hitler's agression, not to grab bits of Germany. You fail yet again.
More BS from you, supplies were being dropped not only during the Warsaw uprising.
So what: I pointed out your lies about the Warsaw Uprising.
The treaty of mutual defense signed by France, Britain and Poland - they pledged that if any of the signing parties were attacked the other two were immediately to aid in its defense.
France agreed to lunch full-scale attack within 15 days against Germany along German western border, and Britain promised RAF bombings of German military targets.
Bombing raids which were launched and which you lie about.
About six of September BOTH allies decided that will brake their promise to Poland and sell her down the river.
a) Got any sources for that or is it just more of your lies?
b) What was the price of this sale? Got any sources about that?
No, they both decided to brake their pledge and that is the fact Harry, not debatable fact !Unquestionable fact !
So unquestionable that you can not even tell us how Britain broke her treaty obligations. Or perhaps you are finally going to answer the question of what support and assistance it was within Britain's power to give which was not given?
You are just going and going, debating facts, how ridiculous and pathetic individual can get, don't you have self-respect or a shred of dignity ?
Kindly note that I am producing facts (with sources to support them): you are presenting your opinions as facts but when challenged to support them you refuse to do so (because you won't admit that you are unable to support your opinions with facts, hence your refusal to answer the questions put to you).
1939 is not her fault
Yet again, what support and assistance was it within Britain's power to give in 1939 which was not given? Keep on ignoring that question sunshine, the louder you scream while refusing to answer that question, the more amusing a sight you are.