Why are posters not told over what they are being warned.
Got to say that I agree with Po here. One would assume that warnings are given so that posters can change that ways so that they post only in a manner which is acceptable to the administrator. but if posters are not told to which post the administrator objects, it is hard for posters to know what they should not post again. Would it really be so hard for moderators to link to the post that they object to and to which they are giving a warning for?
However, with that said, reading between the lines Po appears to be objecting to being given a warning. Have we not now twice been told that the next time Po gets a warning he will get a ban? I personally would expect to get a lengthy band for telling another poster that the mother should have aborted them, especially when doing so in open forum and therefore going off-topic.
You can see the warning in your profile. Here are the possible codes:
What's the code for "Provocation / devil's advocating"? = T (trolling)
Or do you make that up as you go along, just like the reasons why you give certain posters repeated "last" warnings?