Not forcing us into stopping the mobilization, for instance, would be quite helpful.
And how exactly did Britain force Poland not to mobilise? Threaten to invade? Perhaps Poland should have got ready for war before her military dictator started boasting about how much Poland wanted war with Germany?
Royal Air Force was quite strong then, wasn't it? How about bombing the hell out of Germans, for example, no?
No it wasn't. It was neither well equipped nor well trained. As can be seen by the results of the missions in the first week of 1939 (e.g. bombing Denmark).
The Royal Navy was supposed to be the strongest in the world at that time - how
about sinking the entire feckin Kriegsmarine? That might somewhat decrease the German war potential, no?
The same Kriegsmarine which the pride of the Polish navy had run away from? You want Britain to go into waters which the Polish navy considered too dangerous to be in and fight a battle the Polish navy ran from? And the Royal navy wasn't equipped to fight against a U-boat navy, as can be seen by the loss of one British aircraft carrier in September 1939 and another only escaping due to a faulty German torpedo.
The Brits couldn't even put themselves to the trifling inconvenience of diplomatically inducing the French to move their arses off the trenches and invade Germany from the West, when all the best Wehrmacht units were fighting in Poland.
Blame the British for the French doing what the French always do: nice. If Poland was too stupid to know that France always only does what is in the interests of France, that is not the fault of Britain.
That's why you can stop accusing me of lying,because, quite obviously, you are the one who is doing all the lying here.
You are lying, most shamelessly, about Britain betraying Poland. You can neither point to a single part of the treaty which Britain did not keep to nor point out a single action which Britain could have taken in September/October 1939 and did not take. But still you persist in your lie that Britain betrayed Poland: Goebbels would be proud of you.
considering Czech actions during Polish-Soviet war, like not granting military access to Hungary or stopping the trains with military supplies for us,
Supplies which Poland had shown it would be perfectly prepared to use against Czechoslovakia and armies from a country which three years previously had occupied Czechoslovakia. I wonder why Czechoslovakia didn't want either on Czechoslovakian territory.
I have a feeling that we are venturing into the area of cabaret and humorous writing. Wrong thread, I think.
The operation in question is well known and well researched. Even you are clearly not prepared to lie about it.
No... please... and I mean PLEEEEEEEASE - don't tell me that your entire argument hinges upon some memoirs of a man, who could have, or I should say, most likely did have certain obligations towards Great Britain?
Not at all, there are also other eyewitnesses, statements by both the British and Polish governments, media reports from both Britain and Poland (and the USA), historical records, more than enough evidence to shoot down the lies of pathetic losers who can't handle the truth. And I do like the way that you accuse a man who did infinitely more for Poland than you will ever do of being a liar.
No. I gently request that YOU produce a copy of that mythical invitation. If you can't do that, it would seem quite reasonable to shut the f*ck up and stop lying.
Of course, it's all a big lie. The entire world has conspired, most certainly at the demand of the Jews, to lie about the snub that was given to Poland. The lie was even started before the parade and not a single person involved in the lie has ever spoken out about it. Thank god we have people like you to point out the lie (although you forgot to point out the Jewish involvement in yet another of their plots to make Poland look bad).
